2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Dodge Charger
The 2016 Chevrolet Impala uses less fuel: 9.4 against 10.2 l/100km, about 8% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Chevrolet Impala costs about $710 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.
Key figures
Side by side
The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.
| Specification | 2016 Chevrolet Impala | 2016 Dodge Charger |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 220 g/km | 241.7 g/km |
| Combined | 9.4 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km |
| Complaints | 111 | 182 |
| Configuration | FFV | FFV |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement | 3,600 cc | 6,400 cc |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Emission standard | U2 | L2 |
| Extra-urban | 7.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km |
| Fuel | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Gears | 6 | 8 |
| Gross weight | 2,325.6 kg | 2,472.1 kg |
| Height | 1,500 mm | 1,480 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,717 kg | 1,934 kg |
| Length | 5,110 mm | 5,040 mm |
| NCAP overall | 5 | 5 |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic 8-spd |
| Urban | 10.7 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km |
| Wheelbase | 2,840 mm | 3,050 mm |
| Width | 1,850 mm | 1,910 mm |
More on these cars
Other 2016 comparisons in this class
2016 Hyundai Sonata vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Dodge Charger
How this comparison works
Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Compare them yourself
Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed
Related pages
- 2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Dodge Charger Comparison
- 2016 Dodge Charger Car specs
- 2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited Comparison
- 2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Kia Optima Comparison
- Dodge Charger Car specs
- 2017 Dodge Charger Car specs
- 2017 Chevrolet Impala vs 2017 Dodge Charger Comparison