Comparisons · 2016

2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Kia Optima

The 2016 Kia Optima uses less fuel: 8.4 against 9.4 l/100km, about 11% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Kia Optima costs about $887 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

2016 Kia Optima leads on 2 of 3 measurable figures. 16 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2016 Chevrolet ImpalaFull specifications →vsKia2016 Kia OptimaFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Chevrolet Impala9.4 l/100km
2016 Kia Optima8.4 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Chevrolet Impala220 g/km
2016 Kia Optima198.8 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Chevrolet Impala1,717 kg
2016 Kia Optima1,630 kg
Owner complaints
2016 Chevrolet Impala111
2016 Kia Optima754
NCAP overall rating
2016 Chevrolet Impala5
2016 Kia Optima5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Chevrolet Impala2016 Kia Optima
CO2220 g/km198.8 g/km
Combined9.4 l/100km8.4 l/100km
Complaints111754
Cylinders44
Displacement3,600 cc2,400 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Extra-urban7.6 l/100km6.9 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Height1,500 mm1,470 mm
Kerb weight1,717 kg1,630 kg
Length5,110 mm4,860 mm
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)Automatic (S6)
Urban10.7 l/100km9.8 l/100km
Wheelbase2,840 mm2,810 mm
Width1,850 mm1,860 mm

More on these cars

2016 Chevrolet ImpalaAll Chevrolet model years2016 Kia OptimaAll Kia model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Hyundai Sonata vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Dodge Charger2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Dodge Charger

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages