2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata
The 2016 Hyundai Sonata uses less fuel: 7.6 against 10.7 l/100km, about 29% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Hyundai Sonata costs about $2,750 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.
Key figures
Side by side
The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.
| Specification | 2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited | 2016 Hyundai Sonata |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 254.8 g/km | 177.7 g/km |
| Combined | 10.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km |
| Complaints | 111 | 723 |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3,600 cc | 2,400 cc |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Emission standard | U2 | L3SULEV30 |
| Extra-urban | 8.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km |
| Fuel | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Gears | 6 | 6 |
| Gross weight | 2,325.6 kg | 2,039.8 kg |
| Height | 1,490 mm | 1,480 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,613 kg | 1,590 kg |
| Length | 5,090 mm | 4,860 mm |
| NCAP overall | 5 | 5 |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-spd | Automatic (AM7) |
| Urban | 13.1 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km |
| Wheelbase | 2,810 mm | 2,810 mm |
| Width | 1,850 mm | 1,870 mm |
More on these cars
Other 2016 comparisons in this class
2016 Hyundai Sonata vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Dodge Charger2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Dodge Charger
How this comparison works
Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Compare them yourself
Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed
Related pages
- 2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Comparison
- 2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited Comparison
- 2016 Hyundai Sonata Car specs
- 2015 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2015 Hyundai Sonata Comparison
- 2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Dodge Charger Comparison
- 2013 Chevrolet Impala Car specs
- Chevrolet Impala Limited Car specs