2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited
The 2016 Chevrolet Impala uses less fuel: 9.4 against 9.8 l/100km, about 4% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Chevrolet Impala costs about $355 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.
Key figures
Side by side
The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.
| Specification | 2016 Chevrolet Impala | 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 220 g/km | 226.8 g/km |
| Combined | 9.4 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km |
| Complaints | 111 | 723 |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3,600 cc | 2,000 cc |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Emission standard | U2 | U2 |
| Extra-urban | 7.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km |
| Fuel | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Gears | 6 | 6 |
| Gross weight | 2,325.6 kg | 2,100.1 kg |
| Kerb weight | 1,717 kg | 1,636.1 kg |
| NCAP overall | 5 | 5 |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (S6) |
| Urban | 10.7 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km |
More on these cars
Other 2016 comparisons in this class
2016 Hyundai Sonata vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Kia Optima2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Dodge Charger2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Dodge Charger
How this comparison works
Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Compare them yourself
Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed
Related pages
- 2016 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited Comparison
- 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited Car specs
- 2015 Chevrolet Impala vs 2015 Hyundai Sonata Limited Comparison
- 2016 Chevrolet Impala Limited vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Limited Comparison
- Hyundai Sonata Limited Car specs
- 2015 Hyundai Sonata Limited Car specs
- 2016 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Hyundai Sonata Comparison