Comparisons · 2017

2017 Chevrolet Impala vs 2017 Dodge Charger

The 2017 Dodge Charger uses less fuel: 10.2 against 10.7 l/100km, about 5% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Dodge Charger costs about $444 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

2017 Dodge Charger leads on 2 of 3 measurable figures. 19 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2017 Chevrolet ImpalaFull specifications →vsDodge2017 Dodge ChargerFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2017 Chevrolet Impala10.7 l/100km
2017 Dodge Charger10.2 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2017 Chevrolet Impala249.2 g/km
2017 Dodge Charger241.7 g/km
Kerb weight
2017 Chevrolet Impala1,717 kg
2017 Dodge Charger1,934 kg
Owner complaints
2017 Chevrolet Impala116
2017 Dodge Charger128
NCAP overall rating
2017 Chevrolet Impala5
2017 Dodge Charger5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2017 Chevrolet Impala2017 Dodge Charger
CO2249.2 g/km241.7 g/km
Combined10.7 l/100km10.2 l/100km
Complaints116128
ConfigurationFFVFFV
Cylinders66
Displacement3,600 cc6,400 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Emission standardT3B110L2
Extra-urban8.4 l/100km7.8 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears68
Height1,500 mm1,480 mm
Kerb weight1,717 kg1,934 kg
Length5,110 mm5,040 mm
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)Automatic 8-spd
Urban12.4 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Wheelbase2,840 mm3,050 mm
Width1,850 mm1,910 mm

More on these cars

2017 Chevrolet ImpalaAll Chevrolet model years2017 Dodge ChargerAll Dodge model years

Other 2017 comparisons in this class

2017 Hyundai Sonata vs 2017 Kia Optima2017 Chevrolet Impala vs 2017 Hyundai Sonata2017 Dodge Charger vs 2017 Kia Optima2017 Chevrolet Impala vs 2017 Kia Optima

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages