Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2002
Among 41 SUVs from 2002 in the database (one per model family), the 2002 Honda CR-V 2WD is the most fuel-efficient at 10.2 l/100km, against a class average of 14.2 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 10.2–18.1 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked41one per model family
Average14.2 l/100km
Leader2002 Honda CR-V 2WD
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 Honda CR-V 2WD | 10.2 l/100km | -28% | 240.1 g/km | — | 16 | — |
| 2 | 2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 10.7 l/100km | -25% | 251 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 3 | 2002 Saturn Vue FWD | 10.7 l/100km | -25% | 251 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 4 | 2002 Subaru Forester AWD | 11.2 l/100km | -21% | 263 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 5 | 2002 Buick Rendezvous FWD | 11.8 l/100km | -17% | 276.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 6 | 2002 Pontiac Aztek FWD | 11.8 l/100km | -17% | 276.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 7 | 2002 Ford Escape 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | -13% | 290.6 g/km | — | 10 | — |
| 8 | 2002 Hyundai Santa Fe 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | -13% | 290.6 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 9 | 2002 Kia Sportage 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | -13% | 290.6 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 10 | 2002 Mazda Tribute 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | -13% | 290.6 g/km | — | 9 | — |
| 11 | 2002 Nissan Xterra 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | -13% | 290.6 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 12 | 2002 Isuzu Rodeo 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | -8% | 306.8 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 13 | 2002 Mitsubishi Nativa 2WD (Puerto Rico Only) | 13.1 l/100km | -8% | 306.8 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 14 | 2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 13.1 l/100km | -8% | 306.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 15 | 2002 Toyota Highlander 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | -8% | 306.8 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 16 | 2002 Acura MDX | 13.8 l/100km | -3% | 324.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 17 | 2002 Chevrolet Blazer 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | -3% | 324.8 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 18 | 2002 Ford Explorer Sport 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | -3% | 324.8 g/km | — | 10 | — |
| 19 | 2002 Honda Passport 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | -3% | 324.8 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 20 | 2002 Jeep Liberty 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | -3% | 324.8 g/km | — | 14 | — |
| 21 | 2002 Land Rover Freelander | 13.8 l/100km | -3% | 324.8 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 22 | 2002 Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | -3% | 324.8 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 23 | 2002 Audi Allroad | 14.7 l/100km | +4% | 345.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 24 | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | +4% | 345.1 g/km | — | 13 | — |
| 25 | 2002 GMC Envoy 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | +4% | 345.1 g/km | — | 14 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2003 Ranking
- 2008 Saturn Vue Hybrid Car specs
- 2002 Saturn Vue AWD Car specs
- 2009 Saturn Vue AWD Car specs
- Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2004 Ranking
- 2009 Saturn Vue FWD Car specs
- 2003 Saturn Vue AWD recalls and complaints Recalls