Most fuel-efficient cars of 2002
Among 148 cars from 2002 in the database (one per model family), the 2002 Honda Insight is the most fuel-efficient at 4.4 l/100km, against a class average of 12.1 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 4.4–18.1 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked148one per model family
Average12.1 l/100km
Leader2002 Honda Insight
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 Honda Insight | 4.4 l/100km | -64% | 104.2 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 2 | 2002 Toyota Prius | 5.7 l/100km | -53% | 134.7 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 3 | 2002 Toyota Echo | 7.3 l/100km | -40% | 172.6 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 4 | 2002 Chevrolet Prizm | 7.6 l/100km | -37% | 178.1 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 5 | 2002 Toyota Corolla | 7.6 l/100km | -37% | 178.1 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 6 | 2002 Saturn SL | 8.1 l/100km | -33% | 190.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 7 | 2002 Mitsubishi Mirage | 8.4 l/100km | -31% | 197.2 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 8 | 2002 Dodge Neon | 8.7 l/100km | -28% | 204.5 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 9 | 2002 Hyundai Accent/Brio | 8.7 l/100km | -28% | 204.5 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 10 | 2002 Nissan Sentra | 8.7 l/100km | -28% | 204.5 g/km | — | 14 | — |
| 11 | 2002 Suzuki Esteem | 8.7 l/100km | -28% | 204.5 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 12 | 2002 Daewoo Lanos | 9.1 l/100km | -25% | 212.4 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 13 | 2002 Ford Escort | 9.1 l/100km | -25% | 212.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 14 | 2002 Kia Rio | 9.1 l/100km | -25% | 212.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 15 | 2002 Suzuki Aerio | 9.1 l/100km | -25% | 212.4 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 16 | 2002 Ford Focus | 9.4 l/100km | -22% | 220.9 g/km | — | 8 | — |
| 17 | 2002 Honda Civic | 9.4 l/100km | -22% | 220.9 g/km | — | 24 | — |
| 18 | 2002 Hyundai Elantra | 9.4 l/100km | -22% | 220.9 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 19 | 2002 MINI Cooper | 9.4 l/100km | -22% | 220.9 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 20 | 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer | 9.4 l/100km | -22% | 220.9 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 21 | 2002 Acura Rsx | 9.8 l/100km | -19% | 230.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 22 | 2002 Mazda Protege/Protege 5 | 9.8 l/100km | -19% | 230.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 23 | 2002 Saab 9-3 | 9.8 l/100km | -19% | 230.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 24 | 2002 Volkswagen Golf | 9.8 l/100km | -19% | 230.1 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 25 | 2002 Volkswagen New Beetle | 9.8 l/100km | -19% | 230.1 g/km | — | 1 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Most fuel-efficient small cars of 2002 Ranking
- Most fuel-efficient cars of 2001 Ranking
- Most fuel-efficient cars of 2000 Ranking
- Most fuel-efficient small cars of 2001 Ranking
- 2002 cars: every make and model Car specs
- 2001 Chevrolet Prizm Car specs
- 2002 Chevrolet Prizm Car specs