Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2016
Among 90 small cars from 2016 in the database (one per model family), the 2016 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe is the least fuel-efficient at 16.8 l/100km, against a class average of 10.0 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 3.5–16.8 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked90one per model family
Average10 l/100km
Leader2016 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe | 16.8 l/100km | +67% | 396.4 g/km | 2,629 kg | — | — |
| 2 | 2016 Aston Martin DB9 | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 362.9 g/km | 1,856 kg | 1 | — |
| 3 | 2016 Bentley Continental GT | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 360.4 g/km | 2,494.8 kg | — | — |
| 4 | 2016 Bentley Continental GT Convertible | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 375.3 g/km | 2,475 kg | — | — |
| 5 | 2016 Maserati GranTurismo Convertible | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 358.5 g/km | 2,008.1 kg | — | — |
| 6 | 2016 Rolls-Royce Dawn | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 378.4 g/km | 2,545.6 kg | — | — |
| 7 | 2016 Aston Martin Vanquish | 14.7 l/100km | +47% | 344.2 g/km | 1,844 kg | 1 | — |
| 8 | 2016 BMW M6 Convertible | 14.7 l/100km | +47% | 343.6 g/km | 2,045.2 kg | — | — |
| 9 | 2016 Ford Shelby GT350 Mustang | 14.7 l/100km | +47% | 334.9 g/km | 1,732.7 kg | — | — |
| 10 | 2016 Porsche 911 R | 14.7 l/100km | +47% | 337.4 g/km | 1,715 kg | 1 | — |
| 11 | 2016 Aston Martin Rapide S | 13.8 l/100km | +38% | 331.2 g/km | 1,990 kg | — | — |
| 12 | 2016 Roush Performance Stage 3 Mustang | 13.8 l/100km | +38% | 333.7 g/km | 1,828.9 kg | — | — |
| 13 | 2016 BMW 650i xDrive Convertible | 13.1 l/100km | +31% | 300.7 g/km | 2,290.6 kg | — | — |
| 14 | 2016 BMW Alpina B6 Gran Coupe xDrive | 13.1 l/100km | +31% | 300.7 g/km | 2,290.6 kg | — | — |
| 15 | 2016 Ford Mustang Convertible | 13.1 l/100km | +31% | 303.9 g/km | 1,787.6 kg | — | — |
| 16 | 2016 BMW M3 | 12.4 l/100km | +24% | 285.2 g/km | 1,606 kg | 3 | — |
| 17 | 2016 BMW M4 Convertible | 12.4 l/100km | +24% | 285.2 g/km | 1,601 kg | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 Cadillac ATS-V | 12.4 l/100km | +24% | 293.3 g/km | 1,729 kg | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 Ferrari California T | 12.4 l/100km | +24% | 297.6 g/km | 1,730 kg | 4 | — |
| 20 | 2016 Hyundai Genesis Coupe | 12.4 l/100km | +24% | 283.3 g/km | 2,126 kg | 2 | — |
| 21 | 2016 Lexus GS F | 12.4 l/100km | +24% | 293.3 g/km | 1,855.2 kg | 1 | — |
| 22 | 2016 Lexus RC F | 12.4 l/100km | +24% | 288.9 g/km | 1,795 kg | 1 | — |
| 23 | 2016 Nissan GT-R | 12.4 l/100km | +24% | 294.5 g/km | 1,779 kg | 1 | — |
| 24 | 2016 Audi S4 | 11.8 l/100km | +18% | 272.8 g/km | 1,750 kg | — | 5 |
| 25 | 2016 Audi S5 | 11.8 l/100km | +18% | 272.8 g/km | 1,750 kg | — | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- 2025 Aston Martin Vanquish Car specs
- 2019 Aston Martin Vanquish S Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2017 Ranking
- 2026 Aston Martin Vanquish Car specs
- 2027 Aston Martin Vanquish Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2018 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2019 Ranking