Comparisons · 2016

2016 Ford Mustang vs 2016 Volkswagen Jetta

The 2016 Volkswagen Jetta uses less fuel: 7.1 against 12.4 l/100km, about 43% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Volkswagen Jetta costs about $4,702 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year.

2016 Volkswagen Jetta leads on 3 of 3 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Ford2016 Ford MustangFull specifications →vsVolkswagen2016 Volkswagen JettaFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Ford Mustang12.4 l/100km
2016 Volkswagen Jetta7.1 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Ford Mustang298.3 g/km
2016 Volkswagen Jetta171.5 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Ford Mustang1,598 kg
2016 Volkswagen Jetta1,417 kg
NHTSA recalls
2016 Ford Mustang5
2016 Volkswagen Jetta5
Owner complaints
2016 Ford Mustang377
2016 Volkswagen Jetta161

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Ford Mustang2016 Volkswagen Jetta
CO2298.3 g/km171.5 g/km
Combined12.4 l/100km7.1 l/100km
Complaints377161
Cylinders84
Displacement5,200 cc1,984 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardB4S2
Extra-urban9.4 l/100km5.9 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineSingle Fuel
Gears66
Height1,380 mm1,450 mm
Kerb weight1,598 kg1,417 kg
Length4,780 mm4,650 mm
Recall campaigns55
TransmissionManual 6-spdManual 5-spd
Urban15.7 l/100km8.4 l/100km
Wheelbase2,720 mm2,650 mm
Width1,920 mm1,780 mm

More on these cars

2016 Ford MustangAll Ford model years2016 Volkswagen JettaAll Volkswagen model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Ford Focus FWD2016 Ford Focus FWD vs 2016 Hyundai Veloster2016 Ford Focus FWD vs 2016 Volkswagen Jetta2016 Chevrolet Volt vs 2016 Ford Mustang2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Hyundai Veloster2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Ford Fiesta FWD2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Toyota Prius c2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Volkswagen Jetta2016 Ford Fiesta FWD vs 2016 Hyundai Veloster2016 Hyundai Veloster vs 2016 Toyota Prius c

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages