Comparisons · 2016

2016 Chevrolet Volt vs 2016 Ford Mustang

The 2016 Chevrolet Volt uses less fuel: 5.6 against 12.4 l/100km, about 55% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Chevrolet Volt costs about $6,033 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2016 Chevrolet Volt has fewer NHTSA recalls (1 against 5).

2016 Chevrolet Volt leads on 4 of 4 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Chevrolet Volt5.6 l/100km
2016 Ford Mustang12.4 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Chevrolet Volt31.7 g/km
2016 Ford Mustang298.3 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Chevrolet Volt1,607 kg
2016 Ford Mustang1,598 kg
NHTSA recalls
2016 Chevrolet Volt1
2016 Ford Mustang5
Owner complaints
2016 Chevrolet Volt169
2016 Ford Mustang377

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Chevrolet Volt2016 Ford Mustang
CO231.7 g/km298.3 g/km
Combined5.6 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Complaints169377
Recall campaigns15
Cylinders48
Displacement1,500 cc5,200 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3SULEV30B4
Extra-urban5.6 l/100km9.4 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears16
Height1,430 mm1,380 mm
Kerb weight1,607 kg1,598 kg
Length4,580 mm4,780 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (variable gear ratios)Manual 6-spd
Urban5.5 l/100km15.7 l/100km
Wheelbase2,690 mm2,720 mm
Width1,810 mm1,920 mm

More on these cars

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.