2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Hyundai Veloster
The 2016 Chevrolet Cruze uses less fuel: 7.3 against 8.4 l/100km, about 13% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze costs about $976 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2016 Hyundai Veloster has fewer NHTSA recalls (1 against 4). The 2016 Hyundai Veloster has the higher NCAP overall rating (5 stars against 4).
Key figures
Side by side
The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.
| Specification | 2016 Chevrolet Cruze | 2016 Hyundai Veloster |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 170.3 g/km | 199.5 g/km |
| Combined | 7.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km |
| Complaints | 250 | 222 |
| NCAP overall | 4 | 5 |
| Recall campaigns | 4 | 1 |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 1,400 cc | 1,600 cc |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Emission standard | B4 | U2 |
| Extra-urban | 6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km |
| Fuel | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Gears | 6 | 6 |
| Height | 1,460 mm | 1,400 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,250 kg | 1,172 kg |
| Length | 4,670 mm | 4,250 mm |
| Transmission | Manual 6-spd | Manual 6-spd |
| Urban | 8.4 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,650 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm | 1,810 mm |
More on these cars
Other 2016 comparisons in this class
2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Ford Focus FWD2016 Ford Focus FWD vs 2016 Hyundai Veloster2016 Ford Focus FWD vs 2016 Volkswagen Jetta2016 Chevrolet Volt vs 2016 Ford Mustang2016 Ford Mustang vs 2016 Volkswagen Jetta2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Ford Fiesta FWD2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Toyota Prius c2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Volkswagen Jetta2016 Ford Fiesta FWD vs 2016 Hyundai Veloster2016 Hyundai Veloster vs 2016 Toyota Prius c
How this comparison works
Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Compare them yourself
Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed
Related pages
- 2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Ford Focus FWD Comparison
- 2016 Ford Focus FWD vs 2016 Hyundai Veloster Comparison
- 2016 Ford Fiesta FWD vs 2016 Hyundai Veloster Comparison
- 2016 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2016 Ford Fiesta FWD Comparison
- 2016 Hyundai Veloster Car specs
- 2016 Chevrolet Cruze Car specs
- 2015 Hyundai Veloster Car specs