Comparisons · 2019

2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package vs 2019 Toyota C-HR

The 2019 Toyota C-HR uses less fuel: 8.1 against 10.2 l/100km, about 21% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2019 Toyota C-HR costs about $1,863 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2019 Toyota C-HR has fewer NHTSA recalls (3 against 6). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

2019 Toyota C-HR leads on 4 of 4 measurable figures. 15 specifications compared.

Ford2019 Ford Mustang Performance PackageFull specifications →vsToyota2019 Toyota C-HRFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package10.2 l/100km
2019 Toyota C-HR8.1 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package239.8 g/km
2019 Toyota C-HR189.5 g/km
Kerb weight
2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package1,761.8 kg
2019 Toyota C-HR1,497 kg
NHTSA recalls
2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package6
2019 Toyota C-HR3
Owner complaints
2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package149
2019 Toyota C-HR110
NCAP overall rating
2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package5
2019 Toyota C-HR5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package2019 Toyota C-HR
CO2239.8 g/km189.5 g/km
Combined10.2 l/100km8.1 l/100km
Complaints149110
Recall campaigns63
Cylinders44
Displacement2,300 cc1,987 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV70L3ULEV125
Extra-urban8.4 l/100km7.6 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears61
Kerb weight1,761.8 kg1,497 kg
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic (S10)Automatic (AV-S7)
Urban11.8 l/100km8.7 l/100km

More on these cars

2019 Ford Mustang Performance PackageAll Ford model years2019 Toyota C-HRAll Toyota model years

Other 2019 comparisons in this class

2019 Toyota C-HR vs 2019 Volkswagen Jetta2019 Ford Fiesta FWD vs 2019 Volkswagen Jetta2019 Ford Mustang vs 2019 Toyota C-HR

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages