Comparisons · 2019

2019 Toyota C-HR vs 2019 Volkswagen Jetta

The 2019 Volkswagen Jetta uses less fuel: 6.9 against 8.1 l/100km, about 15% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2019 Volkswagen Jetta costs about $1,065 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2019 Toyota C-HR has fewer NHTSA recalls (3 against 11). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

Level on the measurable figures compared below. 19 specifications compared.

Toyota2019 Toyota C-HRFull specifications →vsVolkswagen2019 Volkswagen JettaFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2019 Toyota C-HR8.1 l/100km
2019 Volkswagen Jetta6.9 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2019 Toyota C-HR189.5 g/km
2019 Volkswagen Jetta163.4 g/km
Kerb weight
2019 Toyota C-HR1,497 kg
2019 Volkswagen Jetta1,350 kg
NHTSA recalls
2019 Toyota C-HR3
2019 Volkswagen Jetta11
Owner complaints
2019 Toyota C-HR110
2019 Volkswagen Jetta548
NCAP overall rating
2019 Toyota C-HR5
2019 Volkswagen Jetta5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2019 Toyota C-HR2019 Volkswagen Jetta
CO2189.5 g/km163.4 g/km
Combined8.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
Complaints110548
Recall campaigns311
Cylinders44
Displacement1,987 cc1,395 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV125L3ULEV70
Extra-urban7.6 l/100km5.9 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears18
Height1,570 mm1,460 mm
Kerb weight1,497 kg1,350 kg
Length4,430 mm4,720 mm
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic (AV-S7)Manual 6-spd
Urban8.7 l/100km7.8 l/100km
Wheelbase2,640 mm2,690 mm
Width1,800 mm1,810 mm

More on these cars

2019 Toyota C-HRAll Toyota model years2019 Volkswagen JettaAll Volkswagen model years

Other 2019 comparisons in this class

2019 Ford Fiesta FWD vs 2019 Volkswagen Jetta2019 Ford Mustang vs 2019 Toyota C-HR2019 Ford Mustang Performance Package vs 2019 Toyota C-HR

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages