Comparisons · 2020

2020 Ford Mustang vs 2020 Toyota C-HR

The 2020 Toyota C-HR uses less fuel: 8.1 against 12.4 l/100km, about 35% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2020 Toyota C-HR costs about $3,815 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2020 Toyota C-HR has fewer NHTSA recalls (1 against 8).

2020 Toyota C-HR leads on 4 of 4 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Ford2020 Ford MustangFull specifications →vsToyota2020 Toyota C-HRFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2020 Ford Mustang12.4 l/100km
2020 Toyota C-HR8.1 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2020 Ford Mustang293.3 g/km
2020 Toyota C-HR189.5 g/km
Kerb weight
2020 Ford Mustang1,726 kg
2020 Toyota C-HR1,497 kg
NHTSA recalls
2020 Ford Mustang8
2020 Toyota C-HR1
Owner complaints
2020 Ford Mustang120
2020 Toyota C-HR62

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2020 Ford Mustang2020 Toyota C-HR
CO2293.3 g/km189.5 g/km
Combined12.4 l/100km8.1 l/100km
Complaints12062
Recall campaigns81
Cylinders84
Displacement5,000 cc1,987 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV125L3ULEV125
Extra-urban9.4 l/100km7.6 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears61
Height1,380 mm1,570 mm
Kerb weight1,726 kg1,497 kg
Length4,820 mm4,390 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (S10)Automatic (AV-S7)
Urban14.7 l/100km8.7 l/100km
Wheelbase2,720 mm2,640 mm
Width1,930 mm1,800 mm

More on these cars

2020 Ford MustangAll Ford model years2020 Toyota C-HRAll Toyota model years

Other 2020 comparisons in this class

2020 Nissan Versa vs 2020 Toyota Corolla2020 Acura TLX FWD vs 2020 Audi A42020 Acura TLX AWD vs 2020 Audi A4 quattro

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages