Comparisons · 2018

2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD

The 2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD uses less fuel: 11.2 against 11.8 l/100km, about 5% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD costs about $532 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (1 against 3).

Level on the measurable figures compared below. 19 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WDFull specifications →vsToyota2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD11.8 l/100km
2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD11.2 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD273.4 g/km
2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD262.2 g/km
Kerb weight
2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD1,891 kg
2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD1,984 kg
NHTSA recalls
2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD1
2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD3
Owner complaints
2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD183
2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD206

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD
CO2273.4 g/km262.2 g/km
Combined11.8 l/100km11.2 l/100km
Complaints183206
Recall campaigns13
Cylinders64
Displacement3,600 cc3,456 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV70T3B70
Extra-urban9.4 l/100km10.2 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears86
Gross weight2,722 kg2,540.1 kg
Height1,790 mm1,790 mm
Kerb weight1,891 kg1,984 kg
Length5,400 mm5,390 mm
TransmissionAutomatic 8-spdAutomatic (S6)
Urban13.1 l/100km11.8 l/100km
Wheelbase3,260 mm3,240 mm
Width1,890 mm1,900 mm

More on these cars

2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WDAll Chevrolet model years2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WDAll Toyota model years

Other 2018 comparisons in this class

2018 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2018 Honda Ridgeline FWD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2018 Honda Ridgeline FWD2018 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages