Comparisons · 2018

2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD

The 2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD uses less fuel: 11.2 against 11.8 l/100km, about 5% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD costs about $532 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (3 against 8).

2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD leads on 3 of 4 measurable figures. 15 specifications compared.

Honda2018 Honda Ridgeline AWDFull specifications →vsToyota2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD11.2 l/100km
2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD11.8 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD263.5 g/km
2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD274 g/km
Kerb weight
2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD2,050.2 kg
2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2,016.2 kg
NHTSA recalls
2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD8
2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD3
Owner complaints
2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD161
2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD206

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD
CO2263.5 g/km274 g/km
Combined11.2 l/100km11.8 l/100km
Complaints161206
Recall campaigns83
Cylinders64
Displacement3,500 cc3,456 cc
DriveAll-Wheel DrivePart-time 4-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV125T3B70
Extra-urban9.4 l/100km10.7 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears66
Gross weight2,730.2 kg2,540.1 kg
Kerb weight2,050.2 kg2,016.2 kg
TransmissionAutomatic 6-spdAutomatic (S6)
Urban13.1 l/100km12.4 l/100km

More on these cars

2018 Honda Ridgeline AWDAll Honda model years2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WDAll Toyota model years

Other 2018 comparisons in this class

2018 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD2018 Honda Ridgeline FWD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD2018 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2018 Honda Ridgeline FWD2018 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2018 Honda Ridgeline AWD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages