Rankings · 2016

Most fuel-efficient two-seaters of 2016

Among 29 two-seaters from 2016 in the database (one per model family), the 2016 Honda CR-Z is the most fuel-efficient at 6.5 l/100km, against a class average of 12.7 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 6.5–18.1 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.

Ranked29one per model family
Average12.7 l/100km
Leader2016 Honda CR-Z

Top 10

12016 Honda CR-Z6.5 l/100km
22016 smart fortwo coupe6.9 l/100km
32016 Mazda MX-57.8 l/100km
42016 Alfa Romeo 4C8.4 l/100km
52016 Audi TT Roadster quattro9.1 l/100km
62016 BMW Z4 Sdrive28i9.1 l/100km
72016 Porsche Boxster9.4 l/100km
82016 Porsche Cayman9.4 l/100km
92016 Chevrolet Corvette11.2 l/100km
102016 Jaguar F-Type S AWD Convertible11.2 l/100km

Full ranking

#VehicleCombinedvs avgCO2WeightRecallsNCAP
12016 Honda CR-Z6.5 l/100km-49%151.6 g/km1,205 kg—4
22016 smart fortwo coupe6.9 l/100km-46%158.4 g/km977 kg1—
32016 Mazda MX-57.8 l/100km-39%185.2 g/km1,058 kg3—
42016 Alfa Romeo 4C8.4 l/100km-34%197 g/km1,128 kg——
52016 Audi TT Roadster quattro9.1 l/100km-29%208.8 g/km1,530 kg2—
62016 BMW Z4 Sdrive28i9.1 l/100km-29%211.3 g/km1,585 kg——
72016 Porsche Boxster9.4 l/100km-26%218.7 g/km1,396.2 kg——
82016 Porsche Cayman9.4 l/100km-26%218.7 g/km1,310 kg——
92016 Chevrolet Corvette11.2 l/100km-12%264.7 g/km1,599 kg2—
102016 Jaguar F-Type S AWD Convertible11.2 l/100km-12%264.7 g/km1,956.8 kg——
112016 Nissan 370Z11.2 l/100km-12%268.4 g/km1,516 kg——
122016 BMW M4 GTS12.4 l/100km-3%296.4 g/km1,637.5 kg——
132016 McLaren Automotive 570S Coupe12.4 l/100km-3%298.9 g/km1,313 kg——
142016 Ferrari 488 Gtb13.1 l/100km+3%308.8 g/km1,475 kg5—
152016 McLaren Automotive 650S Can-Am13.1 l/100km+3%310.1 g/km1,514.1 kg——
162016 McLaren Automotive 675LT Coupe13.1 l/100km+3%310.1 g/km1,230 kg——
172016 Mclaren Automotive Mso Hs13.1 l/100km+3%310.1 g/km1,514.1 kg——
182016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S13.1 l/100km+3%302 g/km1,781.7 kg——
192016 Lamborghini Huracan13.8 l/100km+8%330.6 g/km1,422 kg2—
202016 Porsche 911 GT313.8 l/100km+8%327.5 g/km1,595 kg1—
212016 Aston Martin V8 Vantage14.7 l/100km+15%341.8 g/km1,733.6 kg1—
222016 Aston Martin Vantage GT14.7 l/100km+15%341.8 g/km1,710 kg——
232016 Dodge Viper SRT15.7 l/100km+23%359.8 g/km1,497 kg——
242016 Aston Martin V12 Vantage S16.8 l/100km+32%387.7 g/km1,769.9 kg——
252016 Ferrari F12 tdf16.8 l/100km+32%406.4 g/km1,900.1 kg2—

Related rankings

Least efficient two-seaters of 20162015 edition2017 editionSUVs — 2016cars — 2016large cars — 2016midsize cars — 2016small cars — 2016station wagons — 2016

How this ranking works

Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.

Related calculators

Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss

All calculators →

Related pages