Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2018
Among 86 SUVs from 2018 in the database (one per model family), the 2018 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 is the least fuel-efficient at 19.6 l/100km, against a class average of 11.6 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 7.3–19.6 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked86one per model family
Average11.6 l/100km
Leader2018 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 | 19.6 l/100km | +69% | 473.5 g/km | 2,692.1 kg | — | — |
| 2 | 2018 Toyota Sequoia 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +45% | 381.5 g/km | 2,705.7 kg | 5 | — |
| 3 | 2018 Bentley Bentayga | 15.7 l/100km | +36% | 370.3 g/km | 2,422 kg | 4 | — |
| 4 | 2018 Infiniti QX80 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +36% | 368.5 g/km | 2,758.7 kg | 2 | — |
| 5 | 2018 Lexus LX 570 | 15.7 l/100km | +36% | 371 g/km | 2,714.8 kg | — | — |
| 6 | 2018 Nissan Armada 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +36% | 364.7 g/km | 2,710.7 kg | 1 | 4 |
| 7 | 2018 Toyota Land Cruiser Wagon 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +36% | 369.7 g/km | 2,734.3 kg | — | — |
| 8 | 2018 BMW X5 M | 14.7 l/100km | +27% | 341.1 g/km | 2,385.9 kg | 1 | — |
| 9 | 2018 BMW X6 M | 14.7 l/100km | +27% | 341.1 g/km | 2,385.9 kg | 3 | — |
| 10 | 2018 Lexus GX 460 | 14.7 l/100km | +27% | 340.5 g/km | 2,406.3 kg | — | — |
| 11 | 2018 Maserati Levante | 14.7 l/100km | +27% | 340.5 g/km | 2,109 kg | 1 | — |
| 12 | 2018 Cadillac Escalade 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | +19% | 321.2 g/km | 2,740 kg | 1 | 4 |
| 13 | 2018 Chevrolet Tahoe C1500 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | +19% | 321.2 g/km | 2,408 kg | — | — |
| 14 | 2018 Dodge Durango AWD | 13.8 l/100km | +19% | 331.2 g/km | 2,533.3 kg | 5 | 4 |
| 15 | 2018 Ford Flex AWD | 13.8 l/100km | +19% | 325 g/km | 2,194.9 kg | 3 | — |
| 16 | 2018 Lincoln Mkt AWD | 13.8 l/100km | +19% | 325 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 17 | 2018 Porsche Cayenne Turbo | 13.8 l/100km | +19% | 333.1 g/km | 2,378.2 kg | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 Ford Expedition Max 4WD | 13.1 l/100km | +13% | 307 g/km | 2,628 kg | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 Ford Explorer AWD | 13.1 l/100km | +13% | 302 g/km | 2,155.5 kg | 7 | 5 |
| 20 | 2018 Jeep Wrangler 4WD | 13.1 l/100km | +13% | 298.3 g/km | 1,905 kg | 14 | — |
| 21 | 2018 Land Rover Range Rover Lwb | 13.1 l/100km | +13% | 305.1 g/km | 2,413 kg | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 Lincoln Navigator 4WD | 13.1 l/100km | +13% | 310.1 g/km | 2,741.5 kg | 12 | 5 |
| 23 | 2018 Toyota 4Runner 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | +13% | 297.6 g/km | 2,155 kg | 5 | 4 |
| 24 | 2018 Alfa Romeo Stelvio AWD | 12.4 l/100km | +7% | 292 g/km | 1,750 kg | 11 | — |
| 25 | 2018 Chevrolet Suburban C1500 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | +7% | 290.8 g/km | 2,511 kg | — | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2017 Ranking
- 2017 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 Car specs
- 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 Car specs
- 2018 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2016 Ranking
- Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2015 Ranking