Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2017
Among 81 SUVs from 2017 in the database (one per model family), the 2017 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 is the least fuel-efficient at 19.6 l/100km, against a class average of 11.9 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 8.1–19.6 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked81one per model family
Average11.9 l/100km
Leader2017 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 | 19.6 l/100km | +65% | 473.5 g/km | 2,692.1 kg | — | — |
| 2 | 2017 Toyota Sequoia 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +41% | 380.9 g/km | 2,721.6 kg | 3 | — |
| 3 | 2017 Bentley Bentayga | 15.7 l/100km | +32% | 370.3 g/km | 2,422 kg | 2 | — |
| 4 | 2017 Infiniti QX80 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +32% | 368.5 g/km | 2,762.8 kg | 1 | — |
| 5 | 2017 Lexus LX 570 | 15.7 l/100km | +32% | 370.3 g/km | 2,714.8 kg | — | — |
| 6 | 2017 Nissan Armada 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +32% | 365.4 g/km | 2,707.9 kg | — | — |
| 7 | 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser Wagon 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +32% | 369.7 g/km | 2,520.2 kg | — | — |
| 8 | 2017 BMW X5 M | 14.7 l/100km | +23% | 341.1 g/km | 2,385.9 kg | — | — |
| 9 | 2017 BMW X6 M | 14.7 l/100km | +23% | 341.1 g/km | 2,385.9 kg | 1 | — |
| 10 | 2017 Ford Expedition EL 4WD | 14.7 l/100km | +23% | 337.4 g/km | — | — | 5 |
| 11 | 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Lwb | 14.7 l/100km | +23% | 354.2 g/km | 2,413 kg | — | — |
| 12 | 2017 Lexus GX 460 | 14.7 l/100km | +23% | 340.5 g/km | 2,406.3 kg | — | — |
| 13 | 2017 Lincoln Navigator L 4WD | 14.7 l/100km | +23% | 339.3 g/km | 2,263.4 kg | — | — |
| 14 | 2017 Maserati Levante | 14.7 l/100km | +23% | 340.5 g/km | 2,109 kg | 3 | — |
| 15 | 2017 Buick Enclave AWD | 13.8 l/100km | +16% | 321.9 g/km | 2,302.4 kg | 3 | 5 |
| 16 | 2017 Cadillac Escalade 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | +16% | 318.1 g/km | 2,740 kg | 2 | 4 |
| 17 | 2017 Chevrolet Traverse AWD | 13.8 l/100km | +16% | 321.9 g/km | — | 3 | 5 |
| 18 | 2017 Ford Flex AWD | 13.8 l/100km | +16% | 325 g/km | 2,263.4 kg | 4 | — |
| 19 | 2017 GMC Acadia Limited AWD | 13.8 l/100km | +16% | 321.9 g/km | — | 4 | 5 |
| 20 | 2017 Lincoln Mkt AWD | 13.8 l/100km | +16% | 325 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 21 | 2017 Porsche Cayenne Turbo | 13.8 l/100km | +16% | 333.1 g/km | 2,378.2 kg | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 Ford Explorer AWD | 13.1 l/100km | +10% | 307 g/km | 2,263.4 kg | 14 | 5 |
| 23 | 2017 GMC Terrain AWD | 13.1 l/100km | +10% | 303.9 g/km | 1,748 kg | 1 | 4 |
| 24 | 2017 Infiniti Qx70 AWD | 13.1 l/100km | +10% | 302 g/km | 1,985.4 kg | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 Jeep Wrangler 4WD | 13.1 l/100km | +10% | 298.3 g/km | 1,860 kg | 5 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2016 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2018 Ranking
- 2017 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 Car specs
- 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 Car specs
- 2018 Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 Car specs
- Mercedes-Benz AMG G65 Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2015 Ranking