Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2006
Among 57 SUVs from 2006 in the database (one per model family), the 2006 Dodge Durango 2WD is the least fuel-efficient at 19.6 l/100km, against a class average of 14.4 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 10.7–19.6 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked57one per model family
Average14.4 l/100km
Leader2006 Dodge Durango 2WD
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 Dodge Durango 2WD | 19.6 l/100km | +37% | 460.2 g/km | — | 10 | — |
| 2 | 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4WD | 19.6 l/100km | +37% | 460.2 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 3 | 2006 Cadillac Escalade AWD | 18.1 l/100km | +26% | 424.8 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 4 | 2006 Lincoln Navigator 2WD | 18.1 l/100km | +26% | 424.8 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 5 | 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 6 | 2006 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 7 | 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer AWD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 8 | — |
| 8 | 2006 Ford Expedition 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 9 | 2006 Infiniti QX56 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 10 | 2006 Jeep Commander 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 11 | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 12 | 2006 Nissan Armada 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 13 | 2006 Toyota Sequoia 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 10 | — |
| 14 | 2006 Cadillac SRX AWD | 15.7 l/100km | +9% | 368.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 15 | 2006 Dodge Magnum | 15.7 l/100km | +9% | 368.1 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 16 | 2006 Ford Explorer 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +9% | 368.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 17 | 2006 GMC Envoy Xl 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +9% | 368.1 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 18 | 2006 Jeep Wrangler/TJ 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +9% | 368.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 19 | 2006 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +9% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 20 | 2006 Porsche Cayenne | 15.7 l/100km | +9% | 368.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 21 | 2006 Volvo Xc90 AWD | 15.7 l/100km | +9% | 368.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 22 | 2006 BMW X5 | 14.7 l/100km | +2% | 345.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 23 | 2006 Buick Rainier AWD | 14.7 l/100km | +2% | 345.1 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 24 | 2006 Hummer H3 4WD | 14.7 l/100km | +2% | 345.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 25 | 2006 Kia Sorento 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | +2% | 345.1 g/km | — | 1 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2004 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2007 Ranking
- Most recalled SUVs of 2006 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2005 Ranking
- 2010 Jeep Commander 4WD Car specs
- 2010 Jeep Commander 2WD Car specs
- 2009 Jeep Commander 2WD Car specs