Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2005
Among 57 SUVs from 2005 in the database (one per model family), the 2005 Cadillac Escalade AWD is the least fuel-efficient at 18.1 l/100km, against a class average of 14.3 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 10.2–18.1 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked57one per model family
Average14.3 l/100km
Leader2005 Cadillac Escalade AWD
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 Cadillac Escalade AWD | 18.1 l/100km | +27% | 424.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 2 | 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche 1500 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 3 | 2005 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 4 | 2005 Dodge Durango 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 9 | — |
| 5 | 2005 Ford Expedition 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 6 | 2005 Ford Explorer 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 7 | 2005 GMC Yukon Xl 1500 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 8 | 2005 Infiniti QX56 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 9 | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 10 | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 11 | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 12 | 2005 Nissan Armada 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 13 | 2005 Porsche Cayenne Turbo | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 14 | 2005 Volkswagen Touareg | 16.8 l/100km | +17% | 394.4 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 15 | 2005 Buick Rainier AWD | 15.7 l/100km | +10% | 368.1 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 16 | 2005 Cadillac SRX AWD | 15.7 l/100km | +10% | 368.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 17 | 2005 GMC Envoy 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +10% | 368.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 18 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler/TJ 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +10% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 19 | 2005 Saab 9-7x AWD | 15.7 l/100km | +10% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 20 | 2005 Toyota Sequoia 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +10% | 368.1 g/km | — | 11 | — |
| 21 | 2005 Volvo Xc90 AWD | 15.7 l/100km | +10% | 368.1 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 22 | 2005 Audi Allroad quattro | 14.7 l/100km | +3% | 345.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 23 | 2005 BMW X5 | 14.7 l/100km | +3% | 345.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 24 | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | +3% | 345.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 25 | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder 4WD | 14.7 l/100km | +3% | 345.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- 2008 Land Rover LR3 Car specs
- 2007 Land Rover LR3 Car specs
- 2005 Land Rover LR3 Car specs
- 2006 Land Rover LR3 Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2006 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2007 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2008 Ranking