Comparisons · 2019

2019 Ford Ranger 2WD vs 2019 RAM 1500 2WD

The 2019 Ford Ranger 2WD uses less fuel: 10.2 against 10.7 l/100km, about 5% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2019 Ford Ranger 2WD costs about $444 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2019 Ford Ranger 2WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (11 against 30). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

2019 Ford Ranger 2WD leads on 4 of 4 measurable figures. 20 specifications compared.

Ford2019 Ford Ranger 2WDFull specifications →vsRAM2019 RAM 1500 2WDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2019 Ford Ranger 2WD10.2 l/100km
2019 RAM 1500 2WD10.7 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2019 Ford Ranger 2WD240.5 g/km
2019 RAM 1500 2WD252.9 g/km
Kerb weight
2019 Ford Ranger 2WD2,014 kg
2019 RAM 1500 2WD2,308 kg
NHTSA recalls
2019 Ford Ranger 2WD11
2019 RAM 1500 2WD30
Owner complaints
2019 Ford Ranger 2WD267
2019 RAM 1500 2WD1,477
NCAP overall rating
2019 Ford Ranger 2WD4
2019 RAM 1500 2WD4

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2019 Ford Ranger 2WD2019 RAM 1500 2WD
CO2240.5 g/km252.9 g/km
Combined10.2 l/100km10.7 l/100km
Complaints2671,477
Recall campaigns1130
Cylinders46
Displacement2,300 cc5,700 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV70T3B160
Extra-urban9.1 l/100km9.4 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears106
Gross weight2,744.2 kg3,129.8 kg
Height1,810 mm1,970 mm
Kerb weight2,014 kg2,308 kg
Length5,360 mm5,820 mm
NCAP overall44
TransmissionAutomatic (S10)Automatic 8-spd
Urban11.2 l/100km11.8 l/100km
Wheelbase3,220 mm3,570 mm
Width1,860 mm2,080 mm

More on these cars

2019 Ford Ranger 2WDAll Ford model years2019 RAM 1500 2WDAll RAM model years

Other 2019 comparisons in this class

2019 Honda Ridgeline FWD vs 2019 RAM 1500 2WD2019 Ford Ranger 2WD vs 2019 Honda Ridgeline FWD2019 Ford Ranger 4WD vs 2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages