Comparisons · 2019

2019 Ford Ranger 4WD vs 2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD

The 2019 Ford Ranger 4WD uses less fuel: 10.7 against 11.2 l/100km, about 4% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2019 Ford Ranger 4WD costs about $444 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2019 Ford Ranger 4WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (11 against 12). The 2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD has the higher NCAP overall rating (5 stars against 4).

2019 Ford Ranger 4WD leads on 3 of 5 measurable figures. 16 specifications compared.

Ford2019 Ford Ranger 4WDFull specifications →vsHonda2019 Honda Ridgeline AWDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2019 Ford Ranger 4WD10.7 l/100km
2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD11.2 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2019 Ford Ranger 4WD251 g/km
2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD263.5 g/km
Kerb weight
2019 Ford Ranger 4WD2,053.4 kg
2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD2,050.2 kg
NHTSA recalls
2019 Ford Ranger 4WD11
2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD12
Owner complaints
2019 Ford Ranger 4WD267
2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD236
NCAP overall rating
2019 Ford Ranger 4WD4
2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2019 Ford Ranger 4WD2019 Honda Ridgeline AWD
CO2251 g/km263.5 g/km
Combined10.7 l/100km11.2 l/100km
Complaints267236
NCAP overall45
Recall campaigns1112
Cylinders46
Displacement2,300 cc3,500 cc
DrivePart-time 4-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV70L3ULEV125
Extra-urban9.8 l/100km9.4 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears106
Gross weight2,744.2 kg2,730.2 kg
Kerb weight2,053.4 kg2,050.2 kg
TransmissionAutomatic (S10)Automatic 6-spd
Urban11.8 l/100km13.1 l/100km

More on these cars

2019 Ford Ranger 4WDAll Ford model years2019 Honda Ridgeline AWDAll Honda model years

Other 2019 comparisons in this class

2019 Ford Ranger 2WD vs 2019 RAM 1500 2WD2019 Honda Ridgeline FWD vs 2019 RAM 1500 2WD2019 Ford Ranger 2WD vs 2019 Honda Ridgeline FWD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages