Comparisons · 2020

2020 Ford Ranger 2WD vs 2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD

The 2020 Ford Ranger 2WD uses less fuel: 10.2 against 10.7 l/100km, about 5% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2020 Ford Ranger 2WD costs about $444 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2020 Ford Ranger 2WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (7 against 9). The 2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD has the higher NCAP overall rating (5 stars against 4).

2020 Ford Ranger 2WD leads on 4 of 5 measurable figures. 20 specifications compared.

Ford2020 Ford Ranger 2WDFull specifications →vsHonda2020 Honda Ridgeline FWDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2020 Ford Ranger 2WD10.2 l/100km
2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD10.7 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2020 Ford Ranger 2WD240.5 g/km
2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD252.9 g/km
Kerb weight
2020 Ford Ranger 2WD2,014 kg
2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD2,015 kg
NHTSA recalls
2020 Ford Ranger 2WD7
2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD9
Owner complaints
2020 Ford Ranger 2WD127
2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD169
NCAP overall rating
2020 Ford Ranger 2WD4
2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2020 Ford Ranger 2WD2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD
CO2240.5 g/km252.9 g/km
Combined10.2 l/100km10.7 l/100km
Complaints127169
NCAP overall45
Recall campaigns79
Cylinders46
Displacement2,300 cc3,500 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV70L3ULEV125
Extra-urban9.1 l/100km9.1 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears109
Gross weight2,744.2 kg2,730.2 kg
Height1,810 mm1,800 mm
Kerb weight2,014 kg2,015 kg
Length5,360 mm5,330 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (S10)Automatic (S9)
Urban11.2 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Wheelbase3,220 mm3,180 mm
Width1,860 mm2,000 mm

More on these cars

2020 Ford Ranger 2WDAll Ford model years2020 Honda Ridgeline FWDAll Honda model years

Other 2020 comparisons in this class

2020 Honda Ridgeline FWD vs 2020 RAM 1500 2WD2020 Ford Ranger 2WD vs 2020 RAM 1500 2WD2020 Ford Ranger 4WD vs 2020 Honda Ridgeline AWD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages