Comparisons · 2018

2018 Ford Mustang vs 2018 Toyota C-HR

The 2018 Toyota C-HR uses less fuel: 8.1 against 12.4 l/100km, about 35% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2018 Toyota C-HR costs about $3,815 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2018 Toyota C-HR has fewer NHTSA recalls (1 against 4).

2018 Toyota C-HR leads on 3 of 4 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Ford2018 Ford MustangFull specifications →vsToyota2018 Toyota C-HRFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2018 Ford Mustang12.4 l/100km
2018 Toyota C-HR8.1 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2018 Ford Mustang290.8 g/km
2018 Toyota C-HR189.5 g/km
Kerb weight
2018 Ford Mustang1,726 kg
2018 Toyota C-HR1,497 kg
NHTSA recalls
2018 Ford Mustang4
2018 Toyota C-HR1
Owner complaints
2018 Ford Mustang193
2018 Toyota C-HR320

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2018 Ford Mustang2018 Toyota C-HR
CO2290.8 g/km189.5 g/km
Combined12.4 l/100km8.1 l/100km
Complaints193320
Recall campaigns41
Cylinders84
Displacement5,200 cc1,987 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardU2L3ULEV125
Extra-urban9.4 l/100km7.6 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears61
Height1,380 mm1,570 mm
Kerb weight1,726 kg1,497 kg
Length4,820 mm4,430 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (S10)Automatic (AV-S7)
Urban14.7 l/100km8.7 l/100km
Wheelbase2,720 mm2,640 mm
Width1,930 mm1,800 mm

More on these cars

2018 Ford MustangAll Ford model years2018 Toyota C-HRAll Toyota model years

Other 2018 comparisons in this class

2018 Ford Focus FWD vs 2018 Toyota C-HR2018 Chevrolet Volt vs 2018 Ford Focus FWD2018 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2018 Ford Focus FWD2018 Chevrolet Volt vs 2018 Toyota C-HR2018 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2018 Toyota C-HR2018 Chevrolet Volt vs 2018 Ford Mustang

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages