Comparisons · 2017

2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid vs 2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD

The 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid uses less fuel: 7.3 against 10.7 l/100km, about 32% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid costs about $3,017 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid has fewer NHTSA recalls (5 against 10).

2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid leads on 3 of 3 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid7.3 l/100km
2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD10.7 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid65.9 g/km
2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD254.1 g/km
Kerb weight
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid2,242 kg
2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD2,090 kg
NHTSA recalls
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid5
2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD10

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD
CO265.9 g/km254.1 g/km
Combined7.3 l/100km10.7 l/100km
Recall campaigns510
Cylinders66
Displacement3,600 cc3,456 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3SULEV30L3ULEV70
Extra-urban7.1 l/100km8.7 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears18
Gross weight2,857.6 kg2,719.3 kg
Height1,780 mm1,800 mm
Kerb weight2,242 kg2,090 kg
Length5,190 mm5,080 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (variable gear ratios)Automatic (S8)
Urban7.3 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Wheelbase3,100 mm3,030 mm
Width2,020 mm1,980 mm

More on these cars

Other 2017 comparisons in this class

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.