Comparisons · 2017

2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid vs 2017 Honda Odyssey

The 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid uses less fuel: 7.3 against 10.7 l/100km, about 32% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid costs about $3,017 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2017 Honda Odyssey has fewer NHTSA recalls (2 against 5).

2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid leads on 2 of 3 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid7.3 l/100km
2017 Honda Odyssey10.7 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid65.9 g/km
2017 Honda Odyssey251 g/km
Kerb weight
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid2,242 kg
2017 Honda Odyssey1,996 kg
NHTSA recalls
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid5
2017 Honda Odyssey2

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid2017 Honda Odyssey
CO265.9 g/km251 g/km
Combined7.3 l/100km10.7 l/100km
Recall campaigns52
Cylinders66
Displacement3,600 cc3,500 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3SULEV30U2
Extra-urban7.1 l/100km8.7 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears16
Gross weight2,857.6 kg2,730.2 kg
Height1,780 mm1,740 mm
Kerb weight2,242 kg1,996 kg
Length5,190 mm5,150 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (variable gear ratios)Automatic 6-spd
Urban7.3 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Wheelbase3,100 mm3,000 mm
Width2,020 mm2,010 mm

More on these cars

Other 2017 comparisons in this class

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.