2017 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2017 Honda Odyssey
The 2017 Honda Odyssey has fewer NHTSA recalls (2 against 11). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.
Key figures
Side by side
The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.
| Specification | 2017 Chrysler Pacifica | 2017 Honda Odyssey |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 249.2 g/km | 251 g/km |
| Complaints | 1,521 | 39 |
| Recall campaigns | 11 | 2 |
| Combined | 10.7 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 3,600 cc | 3,500 cc |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Emission standard | T3B110 | U2 |
| Extra-urban | 8.4 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km |
| Fuel | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Gears | 6 | 6 |
| Gross weight | 2,744.2 kg | 2,730.2 kg |
| Height | 1,780 mm | 1,740 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,964 kg | 1,996 kg |
| Length | 5,190 mm | 5,150 mm |
| NCAP overall | 5 | 5 |
| Transmission | Automatic 9-spd | Automatic 6-spd |
| Urban | 12.4 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km |
| Wheelbase | 3,100 mm | 3,000 mm |
| Width | 2,020 mm | 2,010 mm |
More on these cars
Other 2017 comparisons in this class
2017 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2017 Dodge Grand Caravan2017 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD2017 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2017 Kia Sedona2017 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD2017 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2017 Kia Sedona2017 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2017 Honda Odyssey2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid vs 2017 Dodge Grand Caravan2017 Kia Sedona vs 2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD2017 Honda Odyssey vs 2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid vs 2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD
How this comparison works
Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Compare them yourself
Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed
Related pages
- 2017 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2017 Toyota Sienna 2WD Comparison
- 2017 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2017 Dodge Grand Caravan Comparison
- 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Car specs
- 2017 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2017 Kia Sedona Comparison
- Chrysler Pacifica Car specs
- 2019 Chrysler Pacifica Car specs
- 2020 Chrysler Pacifica Car specs