Comparisons · 2017

2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid vs 2017 Kia Sedona

The 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid uses less fuel: 7.3 against 11.8 l/100km, about 38% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid costs about $3,993 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2017 Kia Sedona has fewer NHTSA recalls (4 against 5).

2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid leads on 2 of 3 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid7.3 l/100km
2017 Kia Sedona11.8 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid65.9 g/km
2017 Kia Sedona275.3 g/km
Kerb weight
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid2,242 kg
2017 Kia Sedona2,002 kg
NHTSA recalls
2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid5
2017 Kia Sedona4

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid2017 Kia Sedona
CO265.9 g/km275.3 g/km
Combined7.3 l/100km11.8 l/100km
Recall campaigns54
Cylinders66
Displacement3,600 cc3,300 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3SULEV30U2
Extra-urban7.1 l/100km9.8 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears16
Gross weight2,857.6 kg2,760.1 kg
Height1,780 mm1,740 mm
Kerb weight2,242 kg2,002 kg
Length5,190 mm5,120 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (variable gear ratios)Automatic (S6)
Urban7.3 l/100km13.1 l/100km
Wheelbase3,100 mm3,060 mm
Width2,020 mm1,990 mm

More on these cars

Other 2017 comparisons in this class

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.