Comparisons · 2016

2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2016 Honda Accord

The 2016 Honda Accord uses less fuel: 8.1 against 10.2 l/100km, about 21% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Honda Accord costs about $1,863 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2016 Chrysler 200 has fewer NHTSA recalls (2 against 4). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

Level on the measurable figures compared below. 19 specifications compared.

Chrysler2016 Chrysler 200Full specifications →vsHonda2016 Honda AccordFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Chrysler 20010.2 l/100km
2016 Honda Accord8.1 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Chrysler 200241.1 g/km
2016 Honda Accord188.9 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Chrysler 2001,575 kg
2016 Honda Accord1,496 kg
NHTSA recalls
2016 Chrysler 2002
2016 Honda Accord4
Owner complaints
2016 Chrysler 200344
2016 Honda Accord604
NCAP overall rating
2016 Chrysler 2005
2016 Honda Accord5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Chrysler 2002016 Honda Accord
CO2241.1 g/km188.9 g/km
Combined10.2 l/100km8.1 l/100km
Complaints344604
Recall campaigns24
Cylinders64
Displacement3,600 cc3,500 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardB4L3SULEV30
Extra-urban7.6 l/100km6.9 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears66
Height1,470 mm1,470 mm
Kerb weight1,575 kg1,496 kg
Length4,900 mm4,890 mm
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic 9-spdAutomatic (AV-S7)
Urban12.4 l/100km9.1 l/100km
Wheelbase2,750 mm2,780 mm
Width1,810 mm1,850 mm

More on these cars

2016 Chrysler 200All Chrysler model years2016 Honda AccordAll Honda model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2016 Nissan Altima2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Nissan Altima2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Chrysler 2002016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Nissan Altima

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages