2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Nissan Altima
The 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited uses less fuel: 8.7 against 9.1 l/100km, about 4% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited costs about $355 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2016 Nissan Altima has fewer NHTSA recalls (4 against 9). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.
Key figures
Side by side
The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.
| Specification | 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited | 2016 Nissan Altima |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 204.4 g/km | 218.7 g/km |
| Combined | 8.7 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km |
| Complaints | 861 | 553 |
| Recall campaigns | 9 | 4 |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement | 2,500 cc | 3,500 cc |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Emission standard | B4 | L3ULEV125 |
| Extra-urban | 7.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km |
| Fuel | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Gears | 6 | 1 |
| Height | 1,460 mm | 1,480 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,625 kg | 1,576 kg |
| Length | 4,870 mm | 4,870 mm |
| NCAP overall | 5 | 5 |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) | Automatic (AV-S7) |
| Urban | 10.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km |
| Wheelbase | 2,740 mm | 2,780 mm |
| Width | 1,850 mm | 1,830 mm |
More on these cars
Other 2016 comparisons in this class
2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2016 Nissan Altima2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Nissan Altima2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Chrysler 2002016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Chrysler 200
How this comparison works
Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Compare them yourself
Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed
Related pages
- 2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Nissan Altima Comparison
- 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD Comparison
- 2016 Nissan Altima Car specs
- 2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2016 Nissan Altima Comparison
- 2016 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2016 Nissan Altima Comparison
- 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited Car specs
- 2026 Acura Adx AWD Car specs