Comparisons · 2016

2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Chrysler 200

The 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited uses less fuel: 8.7 against 10.2 l/100km, about 15% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited costs about $1,331 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2016 Chrysler 200 has fewer NHTSA recalls (2 against 9). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

Level on the measurable figures compared below. 19 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2016 Chevrolet Malibu LimitedFull specifications →vsChrysler2016 Chrysler 200Full specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited8.7 l/100km
2016 Chrysler 20010.2 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited204.4 g/km
2016 Chrysler 200241.1 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited1,625 kg
2016 Chrysler 2001,575 kg
NHTSA recalls
2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited9
2016 Chrysler 2002
Owner complaints
2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited861
2016 Chrysler 200344
NCAP overall rating
2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited5
2016 Chrysler 2005

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited2016 Chrysler 200
CO2204.4 g/km241.1 g/km
Combined8.7 l/100km10.2 l/100km
Complaints861344
Recall campaigns92
Cylinders46
Displacement2,500 cc3,600 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardB4B4
Extra-urban7.1 l/100km7.6 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears66
Height1,460 mm1,470 mm
Kerb weight1,625 kg1,575 kg
Length4,870 mm4,900 mm
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)Automatic 9-spd
Urban10.2 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Wheelbase2,740 mm2,750 mm
Width1,850 mm1,810 mm

More on these cars

2016 Chevrolet Malibu LimitedAll Chevrolet model years2016 Chrysler 200All Chrysler model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Ford Fusion FWD vs 2016 Nissan Altima2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2016 Ford Fusion FWD2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Nissan Altima2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Chrysler 2002016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Honda Accord2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited vs 2016 Nissan Altima

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages