Comparisons · 2017

2017 Chevrolet Volt vs 2017 Ford Mustang

The 2017 Chevrolet Volt uses less fuel: 5.6 against 13.1 l/100km, about 57% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Chevrolet Volt costs about $6,654 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year.

2017 Chevrolet Volt leads on 2 of 3 measurable figures. 17 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2017 Chevrolet VoltFull specifications →vsFord2017 Ford MustangFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2017 Chevrolet Volt5.6 l/100km
2017 Ford Mustang13.1 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2017 Chevrolet Volt31.7 g/km
2017 Ford Mustang306.3 g/km
Kerb weight
2017 Chevrolet Volt1,607 kg
2017 Ford Mustang1,607 kg
Owner complaints
2017 Chevrolet Volt698
2017 Ford Mustang265

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2017 Chevrolet Volt2017 Ford Mustang
CO231.7 g/km306.3 g/km
Combined5.6 l/100km13.1 l/100km
Complaints698265
Cylinders48
Displacement1,500 cc5,200 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3SULEV30U2
Extra-urban5.6 l/100km9.8 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears16
Height1,430 mm1,380 mm
Kerb weight1,607 kg1,607 kg
Length4,580 mm4,780 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (variable gear ratios)Automatic (S6)
Urban5.5 l/100km15.7 l/100km
Wheelbase2,690 mm2,720 mm
Width1,810 mm1,920 mm

More on these cars

2017 Chevrolet VoltAll Chevrolet model years2017 Ford MustangAll Ford model years

Other 2017 comparisons in this class

2017 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2017 Ford Focus FWD2017 Chevrolet Volt vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf2017 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2017 Ford Mustang2017 Ford Mustang vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf2017 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf2017 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages