Comparisons · 2017

2017 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2017 Ford Focus FWD

The 2017 Chevrolet Cruze uses less fuel: 6.4 against 8.4 l/100km, about 24% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Ford Focus FWD costs about $826 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year, because the 2017 Ford Focus FWD requires premium fuel. The 2017 Chevrolet Cruze has fewer NHTSA recalls (2 against 10). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

2017 Chevrolet Cruze leads on 4 of 4 measurable figures. 15 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2017 Chevrolet CruzeFull specifications →vsFord2017 Ford Focus FWDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2017 Chevrolet Cruze6.4 l/100km
2017 Ford Focus FWD8.4 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2017 Chevrolet Cruze169 g/km
2017 Ford Focus FWD195.1 g/km
Kerb weight
2017 Chevrolet Cruze1,312 kg
2017 Ford Focus FWD1,337.2 kg
NHTSA recalls
2017 Chevrolet Cruze2
2017 Ford Focus FWD10
Owner complaints
2017 Chevrolet Cruze201
2017 Ford Focus FWD902
NCAP overall rating
2017 Chevrolet Cruze5
2017 Ford Focus FWD5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2017 Chevrolet Cruze2017 Ford Focus FWD
CO2169 g/km195.1 g/km
Combined6.4 l/100km8.4 l/100km
Complaints201902
Recall campaigns210
Cylinders44
Displacement1,600 cc2,000 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV125S2
Extra-urban4.5 l/100km6.9 l/100km
FuelDieselSingle Fuel
Gears66
Kerb weight1,312 kg1,337.2 kg
NCAP overall55
TransmissionManual 6-spdManual 5-spd
Urban7.8 l/100km9.4 l/100km

More on these cars

2017 Chevrolet CruzeAll Chevrolet model years2017 Ford Focus FWDAll Ford model years

Other 2017 comparisons in this class

2017 Chevrolet Volt vs 2017 Ford Mustang2017 Chevrolet Volt vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf2017 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2017 Ford Mustang2017 Ford Mustang vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf2017 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf2017 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages