Comparisons · 2025

2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD

The 2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD uses less fuel: 10.2 against 11.8 l/100km, about 14% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD costs about $1,420 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (1 against 5).

Level on the measurable figures compared below. 15 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WDFull specifications →vsToyota2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD11.8 l/100km
2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD10.2 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD269.7 g/km
2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD244.8 g/km
Kerb weight
2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD2,245.3 kg
2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD2,054.8 kg
NHTSA recalls
2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD1
2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD5
Owner complaints
2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD27
2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD98

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WD
CO2269.7 g/km244.8 g/km
Combined11.8 l/100km10.2 l/100km
Complaints2798
Recall campaigns15
Cylinders44
Displacement2,700 cc2,393 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Emission standardT3B30OT
Extra-urban10.2 l/100km9.1 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears88
Gross weight3,175.1 kg2,723.8 kg
Kerb weight2,245.3 kg2,054.8 kg
TransmissionAutomatic 8-spdAutomatic (S8)
Urban12.4 l/100km11.8 l/100km

More on these cars

2025 Chevrolet Colorado 2WDAll Chevrolet model years2025 Toyota Tacoma 2WDAll Toyota model years

Other 2025 comparisons in this class

2025 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2025 Toyota Tundra 4WD2025 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2025 Toyota Tundra 4WD Pro2025 Honda Ridgeline AWD vs 2025 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2025 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2025 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2025 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2025 Honda Ridgeline AWD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages