Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2014
Among 78 small cars from 2014 in the database (one per model family), the 2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe is the least fuel-efficient at 16.8 l/100km, against a class average of 10.1 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 4.7–16.8 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked78one per model family
Average10.1 l/100km
Leader2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe | 16.8 l/100km | +67% | 396.4 g/km | 2,629 kg | — | — |
| 2 | 2014 Aston Martin DB9 | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 363.5 g/km | 1,856 kg | 6 | — |
| 3 | 2014 Aston Martin Rapide S | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 363.5 g/km | 1,990 kg | 2 | — |
| 4 | 2014 Aston Martin Vanquish | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 363.5 g/km | 1,739 kg | 2 | — |
| 5 | 2014 Bentley Continental GT Speed Convertible | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 375.3 g/km | 2,494.8 kg | — | — |
| 6 | 2014 Chevrolet Camaro | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 360.4 g/km | 1,987 kg | 4 | — |
| 7 | 2014 Maserati GranTurismo Convertible | 15.7 l/100km | +56% | 358.5 g/km | 2,008.1 kg | — | — |
| 8 | 2014 BMW M6 Convertible | 14.7 l/100km | +46% | 343 g/km | 2,045.2 kg | — | — |
| 9 | 2014 Ferrari California | 14.7 l/100km | +46% | 352.3 g/km | 1,735 kg | 2 | — |
| 10 | 2014 Jaguar XK Convertible | 13.8 l/100km | +37% | 320 g/km | 1,696 kg | — | — |
| 11 | 2014 Roush Performance Stage 3 Mustang | 13.8 l/100km | +37% | 313.8 g/km | 1,756.8 kg | — | — |
| 12 | 2014 Bentley Continental GT | 13.1 l/100km | +30% | 313.8 g/km | 2,475 kg | 1 | — |
| 13 | 2014 Lexus IS F | 13.1 l/100km | +30% | 295.2 g/km | 1,715 kg | 2 | — |
| 14 | 2014 BMW 650i xDrive Convertible | 12.4 l/100km | +23% | 291.4 g/km | 2,290.6 kg | — | — |
| 15 | 2014 Ford Mustang | 12.4 l/100km | +23% | 293.9 g/km | 1,634 kg | 4 | — |
| 16 | 2014 Hyundai Genesis Coupe | 12.4 l/100km | +23% | 285.8 g/km | 1,646.1 kg | 3 | — |
| 17 | 2014 Infiniti Q60 Convertible | 12.4 l/100km | +23% | 288.3 g/km | 1,866.1 kg | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution | 12.4 l/100km | +23% | 292 g/km | 1,662 kg | 2 | — |
| 19 | 2014 Nissan GT-R | 12.4 l/100km | +23% | 293.3 g/km | 1,740 kg | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 Audi S4 | 11.8 l/100km | +17% | 272.8 g/km | 1,765 kg | 1 | 5 |
| 21 | 2014 Audi S5 | 11.8 l/100km | +17% | 272.8 g/km | 1,750 kg | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 Porsche 911 Turbo | 11.8 l/100km | +17% | 279 g/km | 1,715 kg | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 Volkswagen CC 4motion | 11.8 l/100km | +17% | 277.1 g/km | 1,748.1 kg | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 Acura TSX | 10.7 l/100km | +6% | 244.8 g/km | 1,672 kg | 3 | — |
| 25 | 2014 BMW M235i | 10.7 l/100km | +6% | 242.3 g/km | 1,865.2 kg | 3 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2015 Ranking
- 2013 Aston Martin DB9 Car specs
- 2014 Aston Martin Vanquish Car specs
- 2014 Aston Martin DB9 Car specs
- 2014 Aston Martin Rapide S Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2012 Ranking
- Aston Martin Manufacturer