Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2013
Among 65 small cars from 2013 in the database (one per model family), the 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe is the least fuel-efficient at 16.8 l/100km, against a class average of 10.2 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 4.7–16.8 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked65one per model family
Average10.2 l/100km
Leader2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe | 16.8 l/100km | +65% | 395.8 g/km | 2,590 kg | — | — |
| 2 | 2013 Aston Martin DB9 | 15.7 l/100km | +54% | 363.5 g/km | 1,856 kg | 5 | — |
| 3 | 2013 Bentley Continental GT | 15.7 l/100km | +54% | 360.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 4 | 2013 Bentley Continental Gtc | 15.7 l/100km | +54% | 375.3 g/km | 2,240 kg | 1 | — |
| 5 | 2013 BMW M3 Coupe | 14.7 l/100km | +44% | 343 g/km | 1,680 kg | — | — |
| 6 | 2013 BMW M6 Coupe | 14.7 l/100km | +44% | 343 g/km | 2,045 kg | — | — |
| 7 | 2013 Ferrari California | 14.7 l/100km | +44% | 352.3 g/km | 1,735 kg | 2 | — |
| 8 | 2013 Maserati GranTurismo | 14.7 l/100km | +44% | 355.4 g/km | 1,880 kg | — | — |
| 9 | 2013 Ford Mustang | 13.1 l/100km | +29% | 304.5 g/km | 1,634 kg | 6 | — |
| 10 | 2013 Jaguar XK | 13.1 l/100km | +29% | 315.7 g/km | 1,660 kg | 4 | — |
| 11 | 2013 Lexus IS F | 13.1 l/100km | +29% | 295.2 g/km | 1,715 kg | 2 | — |
| 12 | 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution | 12.4 l/100km | +22% | 292 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 13 | 2013 Nissan GT-R | 12.4 l/100km | +22% | 292.7 g/km | 1,740 kg | — | — |
| 14 | 2013 Porsche 911 Turbo | 12.4 l/100km | +22% | 288.3 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 15 | 2013 Audi S4 | 11.8 l/100km | +16% | 272.8 g/km | 1,745 kg | 1 | — |
| 16 | 2013 Audi S5 | 11.8 l/100km | +16% | 272.8 g/km | 1,750 kg | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | 11.2 l/100km | +10% | 265.3 g/km | 1,987 kg | 4 | — |
| 18 | 2013 Chrysler 200 Convertible | 11.2 l/100km | +10% | 264.1 g/km | 1,814 kg | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 Acura TSX | 10.7 l/100km | +5% | 244.8 g/km | 1,672 kg | 4 | — |
| 20 | 2013 BMW 128i | 10.7 l/100km | +5% | 252.9 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 21 | 2013 Lotus Evora | 10.7 l/100km | +5% | 249.8 g/km | 1,436 kg | 1 | — |
| 22 | 2013 Volkswagen Golf R | 10.7 l/100km | +5% | 249.2 g/km | 1,508 kg | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 Volvo C70 FWD | 10.7 l/100km | +5% | 248.5 g/km | 1,750 kg | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 Audi A4 quattro | 10.2 l/100km | 0% | 235.5 g/km | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 Audi A5 Cabriolet quattro | 10.2 l/100km | 0% | 235.5 g/km | — | 1 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2012 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2015 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2011 Ranking
- Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2009 Ranking
- 2009 Aston Martin DB9 Car specs
- 2013 Aston Martin DB9 Car specs
- 2016 Aston Martin DB9 Car specs