Least fuel-efficient small cars of 2000
Among 57 small cars from 2000 in the database (one per model family), the 2000 Ford Mustang is the least fuel-efficient at 16.8 l/100km, against a class average of 10.7 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 6.9–16.8 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked57one per model family
Average10.7 l/100km
Leader2000 Ford Mustang
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 Ford Mustang | 16.8 l/100km | +58% | 394.4 g/km | — | 9 | — |
| 2 | 2000 BMW M5 | 15.7 l/100km | +47% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 3 | 2000 BMW 540i | 14.7 l/100km | +38% | 345.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 4 | 2000 Porsche 911 Carrera | 13.8 l/100km | +29% | 324.8 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 5 | 2000 Audi S4 | 13.1 l/100km | +23% | 306.8 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 6 | 2000 Jaguar XK8 | 13.1 l/100km | +23% | 306.8 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 7 | 2000 Audi A4 quattro | 12.4 l/100km | +16% | 290.6 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 8 | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 12.4 l/100km | +16% | 290.6 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 9 | 2000 Chrysler Sebring Convertible | 12.4 l/100km | +16% | 290.6 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 10 | 2000 Volvo C70 Convertible | 12.4 l/100km | +16% | 290.6 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 11 | 2000 Dodge Avenger | 11.8 l/100km | +11% | 276.1 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 12 | 2000 Volkswagen Jetta | 11.8 l/100km | +11% | 276.1 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 13 | 2000 BMW 323ci | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 14 | 2000 BMW 323i | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 15 | 2000 BMW 328ci | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 16 | 2000 BMW 328i | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 17 | 2000 BMW 528i | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 18 | 2000 Ford Contour | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 19 | 2000 Mercury Cougar | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 20 | 2000 Mercury Mystique | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 21 | 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 10 | — |
| 22 | 2000 Oldsmobile Alero | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 23 | 2000 Pontiac Grand Am | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 8 | — |
| 24 | 2000 Subaru Impreza AWD | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 25 | 2000 Subaru Legacy AWD | 11.2 l/100km | +5% | 263 g/km | — | 4 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- 2000 Jaguar XK8 Car specs
- 2001 Jaguar XK8 Car specs
- 2010 Volvo C70 FWD Car specs
- Jaguar Xk8 Car specs
- 2000 Jaguar XK8 recalls and complaints Recalls
- 2001 Jaguar XK8 recalls and complaints Recalls
- Most recalled small cars of 2000 Ranking