Least fuel-efficient cars of 2000
Among 155 cars from 2000 in the database (one per model family), the 2000 Dodge Durango 4WD is the least fuel-efficient at 19.6 l/100km, against a class average of 12.3 l/100km. The spread from best to worst is 4.4–19.6 l/100km. Electric vehicles are ranked separately by range.
Ranked155one per model family
Average12.3 l/100km
Leader2000 Dodge Durango 4WD
Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 Dodge Durango 4WD | 19.6 l/100km | +59% | 460.2 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 2 | 2000 Cadillac Escalade 4WD | 18.1 l/100km | +47% | 424.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 3 | 2000 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 4WD | 18.1 l/100km | +47% | 424.8 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 4 | 2000 Ford Expedition 2WD | 18.1 l/100km | +47% | 424.8 g/km | — | 11 | — |
| 5 | 2000 Lincoln Navigator 2WD | 18.1 l/100km | +47% | 424.8 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 6 | 2000 BMW 750il/750il Protection | 16.8 l/100km | +36% | 394.4 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 7 | 2000 BMW X5 | 16.8 l/100km | +36% | 394.4 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 8 | 2000 Chevrolet Express 1500/2500 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | +36% | 394.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 9 | 2000 Ford Mustang | 16.8 l/100km | +36% | 394.4 g/km | — | 9 | — |
| 10 | 2000 GMC Savana 1500/2500 2WD (Cargo) | 16.8 l/100km | +36% | 394.4 g/km | — | 1 | — |
| 11 | 2000 Toyota Tundra 4WD | 16.8 l/100km | +36% | 394.4 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 12 | 2000 BMW M5 | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 13 | 2000 Chevrolet Astro AWD (Passenger) | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 14 | 2000 Chevrolet Blazer 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 15 | 2000 Ford Explorer 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 15 | — |
| 16 | 2000 GMC Jimmy 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 17 | 2000 GMC Safari AWD (Passenger) | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 18 | 2000 Infiniti QX4 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 19 | 2000 Isuzu Trooper | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 20 | 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 12 | — |
| 21 | 2000 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 8 | — |
| 22 | 2000 Mitsubishi Montero Sport 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 23 | 2000 Nissan Pathfinder 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | +27% | 368.1 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 24 | 2000 BMW 540i | 14.7 l/100km | +19% | 345.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
| 25 | 2000 BMW 740i/740i Sport | 14.7 l/100km | +19% | 345.1 g/km | — | 2 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- 2000 BMW 750il/750il Protection Car specs
- 2001 BMW 750il Car specs
- Least fuel-efficient large cars of 2000 Ranking
- 2011 GMC Savana 1500 AWD (Cargo) Car specs
- 2012 GMC Savana 1500 AWD (Cargo) Car specs
- 2000 BMW 750il/750il Protection recalls and complaints Recalls
- Least fuel-efficient SUVs of 2000 Ranking