Comparisons · 2016

2016 Nissan Quest vs 2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD

The 2016 Nissan Quest uses less fuel: 10.7 against 11.2 l/100km, about 4% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Nissan Quest costs about $444 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year.

2016 Nissan Quest leads on 3 of 3 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Nissan2016 Nissan QuestFull specifications →vsToyota2016 Toyota Sienna 2WDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Nissan Quest10.7 l/100km
2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD11.2 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Nissan Quest246.7 g/km
2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD267.2 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Nissan Quest2,043 kg
2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD2,115 kg
Owner complaints
2016 Nissan Quest13
2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD75

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Nissan Quest2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD
CO2246.7 g/km267.2 g/km
Combined10.7 l/100km11.2 l/100km
Complaints1375
Cylinders66
Displacement3,500 cc3,456 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV125U2
Extra-urban8.7 l/100km9.4 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineSingle Fuel
Gears16
Gross weight2,715.2 kg2,719.3 kg
Height1,860 mm1,810 mm
Kerb weight2,043 kg2,115 kg
Length5,100 mm5,080 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (variable gear ratios)Automatic (S6)
Urban11.8 l/100km13.1 l/100km
Wheelbase3,000 mm3,030 mm
Width1,970 mm1,980 mm

More on these cars

2016 Nissan QuestAll Nissan model years2016 Toyota Sienna 2WDAll Toyota model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Dodge Grand Caravan2016 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2016 Kia Sedona2016 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2016 Honda Odyssey2016 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD2016 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2016 Nissan Quest2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Kia Sedona2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Honda Odyssey2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Nissan Quest2016 Honda Odyssey vs 2016 Kia Sedona

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages