Comparisons · 2016

2016 Kia Sedona vs 2016 Nissan Quest

The 2016 Nissan Quest uses less fuel: 10.7 against 11.8 l/100km, about 9% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Nissan Quest costs about $976 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year.

2016 Nissan Quest leads on 3 of 3 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Kia2016 Kia SedonaFull specifications →vsNissan2016 Nissan QuestFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Kia Sedona11.8 l/100km
2016 Nissan Quest10.7 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Kia Sedona275.3 g/km
2016 Nissan Quest246.7 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Kia Sedona2,002 kg
2016 Nissan Quest2,043 kg
Owner complaints
2016 Kia Sedona296
2016 Nissan Quest13

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Kia Sedona2016 Nissan Quest
CO2275.3 g/km246.7 g/km
Combined11.8 l/100km10.7 l/100km
Complaints29613
Cylinders66
Displacement3,300 cc3,500 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardU2L3ULEV125
Extra-urban9.8 l/100km8.7 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears61
Gross weight2,760.1 kg2,715.2 kg
Height1,740 mm1,860 mm
Kerb weight2,002 kg2,043 kg
Length5,120 mm5,100 mm
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)Automatic (variable gear ratios)
Urban13.1 l/100km11.8 l/100km
Wheelbase3,060 mm3,000 mm
Width1,990 mm1,970 mm

More on these cars

2016 Kia SedonaAll Kia model years2016 Nissan QuestAll Nissan model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Dodge Grand Caravan2016 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2016 Kia Sedona2016 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2016 Honda Odyssey2016 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD2016 Dodge Grand Caravan vs 2016 Nissan Quest2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Kia Sedona2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Honda Odyssey2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Toyota Sienna 2WD2016 Chrysler Town and Country vs 2016 Nissan Quest2016 Honda Odyssey vs 2016 Kia Sedona

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages