Comparisons · 2016

2016 Nissan Juke vs 2016 Toyota Prius v

The 2016 Toyota Prius v uses less fuel: 5.7 against 7.8 l/100km, about 27% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Toyota Prius v costs about $3,381 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year.

2016 Toyota Prius v leads on 2 of 3 measurable figures. 18 specifications compared.

Nissan2016 Nissan JukeFull specifications →vsToyota2016 Toyota Prius vFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Nissan Juke7.8 l/100km
2016 Toyota Prius v5.7 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Nissan Juke185.8 g/km
2016 Toyota Prius v134.2 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Nissan Juke1,324 kg
2016 Toyota Prius v1,505 kg
NHTSA recalls
2016 Nissan Juke1
2016 Toyota Prius v1
Owner complaints
2016 Nissan Juke28
2016 Toyota Prius v166

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Nissan Juke2016 Toyota Prius v
CO2185.8 g/km134.2 g/km
Combined7.8 l/100km5.7 l/100km
Complaints28166
Cylinders44
Displacement1,600 cc1,798 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardU2B3
Extra-urban7.1 l/100km6 l/100km
FuelPremium GasolineHybrid
Gears11
Height1,570 mm1,580 mm
Kerb weight1,324 kg1,505 kg
Length4,130 mm4,620 mm
Recall campaigns11
TransmissionManual 6-spdAutomatic (variable gear ratios)
Urban8.7 l/100km5.5 l/100km
Wheelbase2,530 mm2,780 mm
Width1,770 mm1,780 mm

More on these cars

2016 Nissan JukeAll Nissan model years2016 Toyota Prius vAll Toyota model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Honda Fit vs 2016 Kia Soul2016 Kia Soul vs 2016 Nissan Juke2016 Nissan Murano FWD vs 2016 Toyota Prius v2016 Honda Fit vs 2016 Nissan Juke2016 Nissan Murano FWD vs 2016 Volkswagen Golf SportWagen2016 Nissan Juke vs 2016 Volkswagen Golf SportWagen

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages