Comparisons · 2016

2016 Kia Soul vs 2016 Nissan Juke

The 2016 Nissan Juke uses less fuel: 7.8 against 9.1 l/100km, about 14% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Kia Soul costs about $364 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year, because the 2016 Nissan Juke requires premium fuel. The 2016 Nissan Juke has fewer NHTSA recalls (1 against 2). The 2016 Kia Soul has the higher NCAP overall rating (5 stars against 4).

2016 Nissan Juke leads on 4 of 5 measurable figures. 19 specifications compared.

Kia2016 Kia SoulFull specifications →vsNissan2016 Nissan JukeFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Kia Soul9.1 l/100km
2016 Nissan Juke7.8 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Kia Soul210 g/km
2016 Nissan Juke185.8 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Kia Soul1,231 kg
2016 Nissan Juke1,324 kg
NHTSA recalls
2016 Kia Soul2
2016 Nissan Juke1
Owner complaints
2016 Kia Soul819
2016 Nissan Juke28
NCAP overall rating
2016 Kia Soul5
2016 Nissan Juke4

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Kia Soul2016 Nissan Juke
CO2210 g/km185.8 g/km
Combined9.1 l/100km7.8 l/100km
Complaints81928
NCAP overall54
Recall campaigns21
Cylinders44
Displacement2,000 cc1,600 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardU2U2
Extra-urban7.8 l/100km7.1 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolinePremium Gasoline
Gears61
Height1,600 mm1,570 mm
Kerb weight1,231 kg1,324 kg
Length4,140 mm4,130 mm
TransmissionManual 6-spdManual 6-spd
Urban9.8 l/100km8.7 l/100km
Wheelbase2,570 mm2,530 mm
Width1,800 mm1,770 mm

More on these cars

2016 Kia SoulAll Kia model years2016 Nissan JukeAll Nissan model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Honda Fit vs 2016 Kia Soul2016 Nissan Murano FWD vs 2016 Toyota Prius v2016 Nissan Juke vs 2016 Toyota Prius v2016 Honda Fit vs 2016 Nissan Juke2016 Nissan Murano FWD vs 2016 Volkswagen Golf SportWagen2016 Nissan Juke vs 2016 Volkswagen Golf SportWagen

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages