2017 Honda Ridgeline FWD vs 2017 Toyota Tacoma 2WD
The 2017 Honda Ridgeline FWD uses less fuel: 10.7 against 11.2 l/100km, about 4% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Honda Ridgeline FWD costs about $444 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2017 Toyota Tacoma 2WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (5 against 9). The 2017 Honda Ridgeline FWD has the higher NCAP overall rating (5 stars against 4).
Key figures
Side by side
The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.
| Specification | 2017 Honda Ridgeline FWD | 2017 Toyota Tacoma 2WD |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | 254.8 g/km | 265.3 g/km |
| Combined | 10.7 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km |
| Complaints | 340 | 239 |
| NCAP overall | 5 | 4 |
| Recall campaigns | 9 | 5 |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3,500 cc | 3,456 cc |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Emission standard | L3ULEV125 | T3B70 |
| Extra-urban | 9.1 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km |
| Fuel | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Gears | 6 | 6 |
| Gross weight | 2,730.2 kg | 2,540.1 kg |
| Height | 1,800 mm | 1,790 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,015 kg | 1,984 kg |
| Length | 5,330 mm | 5,390 mm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-spd | Automatic (S6) |
| Urban | 12.4 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km |
| Wheelbase | 3,180 mm | 3,240 mm |
| Width | 2,000 mm | 1,900 mm |
More on these cars
Other 2017 comparisons in this class
How this comparison works
Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Compare them yourself
Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed
Related pages
- 2018 Honda Ridgeline FWD vs 2018 Toyota Tacoma 2WD Comparison
- 2017 Toyota Tacoma 2WD Car specs
- 2017 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2017 Honda Ridgeline FWD Comparison
- 2017 Honda Ridgeline FWD Car specs
- 2017 Honda Ridgeline AWD vs 2017 Toyota Tacoma 4WD Comparison
- 2019 Ford Ranger 2WD vs 2019 Honda Ridgeline FWD Comparison
- Honda Ridgeline FWD Car specs