Comparisons · 2015

2015 GMC Canyon 4WD vs 2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD

The 2015 GMC Canyon 4WD uses less fuel: 11.2 against 12.4 l/100km, about 10% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2015 GMC Canyon 4WD costs about $1,065 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (4 against 8). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

Level on the measurable figures compared below. 16 specifications compared.

GMC2015 GMC Canyon 4WDFull specifications →vsToyota2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2015 GMC Canyon 4WD11.2 l/100km
2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD12.4 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2015 GMC Canyon 4WD263.5 g/km
2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD285.8 g/km
Kerb weight
2015 GMC Canyon 4WD2,059.3 kg
2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD1,914.2 kg
NHTSA recalls
2015 GMC Canyon 4WD8
2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD4
Owner complaints
2015 GMC Canyon 4WD321
2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD101
NCAP overall rating
2015 GMC Canyon 4WD4
2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD4

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2015 GMC Canyon 4WD2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD
CO2263.5 g/km285.8 g/km
Combined11.2 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Complaints321101
Recall campaigns84
Cylinders44
Displacement3,600 cc3,956 cc
Drive4-Wheel DrivePart-time 4-Wheel Drive
Emission standardB4U2
Extra-urban9.8 l/100km11.2 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineSingle Fuel
Gears66
Gross weight2,721.6 kg2,494.8 kg
Kerb weight2,059.3 kg1,914.2 kg
NCAP overall44
TransmissionAutomatic 6-spdAutomatic 4-spd
Urban12.4 l/100km13.1 l/100km

More on these cars

2015 GMC Canyon 4WDAll GMC model years2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WDAll Toyota model years

Other 2015 comparisons in this class

2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2015 GMC Canyon 2WD2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2015 Toyota Tacoma 2WD2015 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2015 GMC Canyon 4WD2015 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2015 GMC Canyon 2WD vs 2015 Toyota Tacoma 2WD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages