Comparisons · 2015

2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2015 GMC Canyon 2WD

The 2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD has fewer NHTSA recalls (7 against 8).

Level on the measurable figures compared below. 19 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WDFull specifications →vsGMC2015 GMC Canyon 2WDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD10.7 l/100km
2015 GMC Canyon 2WD10.7 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD246.1 g/km
2015 GMC Canyon 2WD246.1 g/km
Kerb weight
2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD1,891 kg
2015 GMC Canyon 2WD1,891 kg
NHTSA recalls
2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD7
2015 GMC Canyon 2WD8
Owner complaints
2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD491
2015 GMC Canyon 2WD321

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD2015 GMC Canyon 2WD
Complaints491321
Recall campaigns78
CO2246.1 g/km246.1 g/km
Combined10.7 l/100km10.7 l/100km
Cylinders44
Displacement3,600 cc3,600 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Emission standardB4B4
Extra-urban9.1 l/100km9.1 l/100km
FuelSingle FuelRegular Gasoline
Gears66
Gross weight2,721.6 kg2,721.6 kg
Height1,790 mm1,790 mm
Kerb weight1,891 kg1,891 kg
Length5,400 mm5,400 mm
TransmissionAutomatic 6-spdAutomatic 6-spd
Urban11.8 l/100km11.8 l/100km
Wheelbase3,260 mm3,260 mm
Width1,890 mm1,890 mm

More on these cars

2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WDAll Chevrolet model years2015 GMC Canyon 2WDAll GMC model years

Other 2015 comparisons in this class

2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2015 Toyota Tacoma 2WD2015 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2015 GMC Canyon 4WD2015 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2015 GMC Canyon 2WD vs 2015 Toyota Tacoma 2WD2015 GMC Canyon 4WD vs 2015 Toyota Tacoma 4WD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages