Comparisons · 2017

2017 Ford Escape AWD vs 2017 Honda CR-V AWD

The 2017 Honda CR-V AWD uses less fuel: 8.1 against 9.8 l/100km, about 17% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Honda CR-V AWD costs about $1,508 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2017 Ford Escape AWD has fewer NHTSA recalls (4 against 7). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

2017 Honda CR-V AWD leads on 3 of 4 measurable figures. 15 specifications compared.

Ford2017 Ford Escape AWDFull specifications →vsHonda2017 Honda CR-V AWDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2017 Ford Escape AWD9.8 l/100km
2017 Honda CR-V AWD8.1 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2017 Ford Escape AWD229.9 g/km
2017 Honda CR-V AWD188.3 g/km
Kerb weight
2017 Ford Escape AWD1,848.4 kg
2017 Honda CR-V AWD1,559 kg
NHTSA recalls
2017 Ford Escape AWD4
2017 Honda CR-V AWD7
Owner complaints
2017 Ford Escape AWD2,681
2017 Honda CR-V AWD1,768
NCAP overall rating
2017 Ford Escape AWD5
2017 Honda CR-V AWD5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2017 Ford Escape AWD2017 Honda CR-V AWD
CO2229.9 g/km188.3 g/km
Combined9.8 l/100km8.1 l/100km
Complaints2,6811,768
Recall campaigns47
Cylinders44
Displacement2,000 cc2,400 cc
DriveAll-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV70L3ULEV70
Extra-urban8.4 l/100km7.1 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears61
Kerb weight1,848.4 kg1,559 kg
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)Automatic (variable gear ratios)
Urban10.7 l/100km8.7 l/100km

More on these cars

2017 Ford Escape AWDAll Ford model years2017 Honda CR-V AWDAll Honda model years

Other 2017 comparisons in this class

2017 Ford Escape FWD vs 2017 Honda CR-V FWD2017 Ford Edge FWD vs 2017 Honda CR-V FWD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages