Comparisons · 2017

2017 Ford Edge FWD vs 2017 Honda CR-V FWD

The 2017 Honda CR-V FWD uses less fuel: 7.8 against 11.8 l/100km, about 34% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2017 Honda CR-V FWD costs about $3,549 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year. The 2017 Honda CR-V FWD has fewer NHTSA recalls (7 against 8). Both hold the same NCAP overall rating.

2017 Honda CR-V FWD leads on 3 of 4 measurable figures. 15 specifications compared.

Ford2017 Ford Edge FWDFull specifications →vsHonda2017 Honda CR-V FWDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2017 Ford Edge FWD11.8 l/100km
2017 Honda CR-V FWD7.8 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2017 Ford Edge FWD270.3 g/km
2017 Honda CR-V FWD181.4 g/km
Kerb weight
2017 Ford Edge FWD1,774 kg
2017 Honda CR-V FWD1,559 kg
NHTSA recalls
2017 Ford Edge FWD8
2017 Honda CR-V FWD7
Owner complaints
2017 Ford Edge FWD1,357
2017 Honda CR-V FWD1,768
NCAP overall rating
2017 Ford Edge FWD5
2017 Honda CR-V FWD5

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2017 Ford Edge FWD2017 Honda CR-V FWD
CO2270.3 g/km181.4 g/km
Combined11.8 l/100km7.8 l/100km
Complaints1,3571,768
Recall campaigns87
Cylinders64
Displacement3,500 cc2,400 cc
DriveFront-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Emission standardL3ULEV125L3ULEV70
Extra-urban9.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
FuelRegular GasolineRegular Gasoline
Gears61
Kerb weight1,774 kg1,559 kg
NCAP overall55
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)Automatic (variable gear ratios)
Urban13.8 l/100km8.4 l/100km

More on these cars

2017 Ford Edge FWDAll Ford model years2017 Honda CR-V FWDAll Honda model years

Other 2017 comparisons in this class

2017 Ford Escape FWD vs 2017 Honda CR-V FWD2017 Ford Escape AWD vs 2017 Honda CR-V AWD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages