Comparisons · 2016

2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD vs 2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD

The 2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD uses less fuel: 9.4 against 11.2 l/100km, about 16% less. At today's US fuel prices the 2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD costs about $2,223 less to fuel over five years at 15,000 km a year, because the 2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD requires premium fuel.

2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD leads on 2 of 3 measurable figures. 19 specifications compared.

Chevrolet2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WDFull specifications →vsToyota2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WDFull specifications →

Key figures

Combined fuel consumption
2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD9.4 l/100km
2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD11.2 l/100km
CO2 emissions
2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD254.1 g/km
2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD267.8 g/km
Kerb weight
2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD1,891 kg
2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD1,984 kg
NHTSA recalls
2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD4
2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD4
Owner complaints
2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD707
2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD323

Side by side

The better figure is highlighted where one is clearly better.

Specification2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD
CO2254.1 g/km267.8 g/km
Combined9.4 l/100km11.2 l/100km
Complaints707323
Cylinders46
Displacement3,600 cc3,456 cc
DriveRear-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Emission standardB4B5
Extra-urban7.8 l/100km9.8 l/100km
FuelDieselRegular Gasoline
Gears66
Gross weight2,722 kg2,540.1 kg
Height1,790 mm1,790 mm
Kerb weight1,891 kg1,984 kg
Length5,400 mm5,390 mm
Recall campaigns44
TransmissionAutomatic 6-spdAutomatic (S6)
Urban10.7 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Wheelbase3,260 mm3,240 mm
Width1,890 mm1,900 mm

More on these cars

2016 Chevrolet Colorado 2WDAll Chevrolet model years2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WDAll Toyota model years

Other 2016 comparisons in this class

2016 Chevrolet Colorado 4WD vs 2016 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2016 GMC Canyon 4WD vs 2016 Toyota Tacoma 4WD2016 GMC Canyon 2WD vs 2016 Toyota Tacoma 2WD

How this comparison works

Only genuine rivals are compared: same model year, same EPA size class, same drivetrain, similar weight and power, and both mainstream or both premium brands. Figures come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA and NHTSA; fuel costs use current US prices from the Energy Information Administration.

Compare them yourself

Fuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioTotal cost of ownershipTotal cost of ownership · Yearly depreciation rate · Projected future valueAcceleration and quarter-mileForce and power for a target acceleration · Theoretical best 0–100 km/h time · Quarter-mile time and trap speed

All calculators →

Related pages