Top 10
Full ranking
| # | Vehicle | Combined | vs avg | CO2 | Weight | Recalls | NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 Ford Escape 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | — | 306.8 g/km | — | 15 | — |
| 2 | 2001 Mazda Tribute 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | — | 306.8 g/km | — | 15 | — |
| 3 | 2001 BMW X5 | 16.8 l/100km | — | 394.4 g/km | — | 12 | — |
| 4 | 2001 Ford Explorer 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | — | 368.1 g/km | — | 12 | — |
| 5 | 2001 Ford Expedition 2WD | 16.8 l/100km | — | 394.4 g/km | — | 10 | — |
| 6 | 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | — | 368.1 g/km | — | 10 | — |
| 7 | 2001 Jeep Cherokee 2WD | 13.1 l/100km | — | 306.8 g/km | — | 8 | — |
| 8 | 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 11.8 l/100km | — | 276.1 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 9 | 2001 Dodge Durango 2WD | 18.1 l/100km | — | 424.8 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 10 | 2001 Jeep Wrangler 4WD | 15.7 l/100km | — | 368.1 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 11 | 2001 Nissan Pathfinder 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | — | 345.1 g/km | — | 7 | — |
| 12 | 2001 Lincoln Navigator 2WD | 19.6 l/100km | — | 460.2 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 13 | 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD | 12.4 l/100km | — | 290.6 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 14 | 2001 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 13.1 l/100km | — | 306.8 g/km | — | 6 | — |
| 15 | 2001 Nissan Xterra 2WD | 12.4 l/100km | — | 290.6 g/km | — | 5 | — |
| 16 | 2001 Acura MDX | 13.8 l/100km | — | 324.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 17 | 2001 Hyundai Santa Fe 2WD | 11.8 l/100km | — | 276.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 18 | 2001 Infiniti QX4 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | — | 368.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 19 | 2001 Isuzu Rodeo 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | — | 324.8 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 20 | 2001 Mercury Mountaineer 2WD | 15.7 l/100km | — | 368.1 g/km | — | 4 | — |
| 21 | 2001 Audi Allroad | 14.7 l/100km | — | 345.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 22 | 2001 Chevrolet Blazer 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | — | 345.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 23 | 2001 GMC Jimmy 2WD | 14.7 l/100km | — | 345.1 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 24 | 2001 Honda Passport 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | — | 324.8 g/km | — | 3 | — |
| 25 | 2001 Toyota 4Runner 2WD | 13.8 l/100km | — | 324.8 g/km | — | 3 | — |
Related rankings
How this ranking works
Values come from FuelEconomy.gov, EPA certification data and NHTSA records shown on each vehicle's page. Only the best-placed version of each model family is listed, so one model cannot fill the list. Electric vehicles are excluded from fuel-consumption rankings and ranked by range instead.
Related calculators
Fuel economy and trip costFuel economy unit converter · Trip fuel and cost · Annual savings from better economyFuel savings and break-evenBreak-even distance for a more economical vehicle · Fuel price at which two vehicles cost the same · Running cost per 100 kmPower-to-weightPower-to-weight ratio · Torque-to-weight ratio · Power needed for a target ratioEV range and consumptionDriving range from battery and consumption · Energy consumption unit converter · Battery health and capacity loss
Related pages
- Most fuel-efficient SUVs of 2001 Ranking
- 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser Car specs
- 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser Car specs
- Most recalled SUVs of 2000 Ranking
- 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser Car specs
- 2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser Car specs
- Most recalled SUVs of 2002 Ranking